Dimitrie O Paun wrote:
On December 16, 2003 08:49 pm, Tom wrote:
Here is the current DLL's Status Page.
Tom, it looks good, but I think it's getting too big.
Why don't we break it in 3 pages:
-- Base DLLs
-- DirectX DLLs
-- Multimedia DLLs
This also makes sense as some people don't care ab
This is an intresting way of looking at it. The
question is, do we have an active inventory of what
constitutes as a "Base DLL" I remeber some infighting
a while back about if the MFC DLLs counted or not.
I think I might be rasing a dead issue though.
-Joshua
--- "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROT
On December 16, 2003 08:49 pm, Tom wrote:
> Here is the current DLL's Status Page.
Tom, it looks good, but I think it's getting too big.
Why don't we break it in 3 pages:
-- Base DLLs
-- DirectX DLLs
-- Multimedia DLLs
This also makes sense as some people don't care about
DirectX/Multimedia
Title: Re: Wine Status Page Pre-1
> 3) Send to Brian V for WWN coverage :) (Brian if you want you can get a
> early start)
Hm. 1.7 meters of snow this week at Steamboat and I have the next three days
off. I'm guessing I won't have much done until Monday.
-
Hello All,
Here is the current DLL's Status Page.
Ive made a number of changes since I last sent
these partial pages to the dev-list.
Here is a list of things I still need todo for completeness.
1) Proof Read! (against all my notes)
2) Doc links, (Thursday night Friday AM)
3) Send to Brian V for W
