2009/11/10 Michael Stefaniuc :
> Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> Did nobody of the packages test what they did?
> It is easy to miss as it requires:
> - Fresh install of Wine (via PackageKit or yum install) and
> - Old 32-bit WINEPREFIX.
Except that it's obvious that the packagers are not people who USE
wine
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> "Michael" == Michael Stefaniuc writes:
>
> Michael> Fedora includes now a 64-bit Wine package (at least in F11)
> Michael> which of course breaks existing Wine setups. "yum install wine"
> Michael> will install the 64-bit version... Looks like we had our
>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Uwe Bonnes
wrote:
>> "Michael" == Michael Stefaniuc writes:
>
> Michael> Fedora includes now a 64-bit Wine package (at least in F11)
> Michael> which of course breaks existing Wine setups. "yum install wine"
> Michael> will install the 64-bit version.
> "Michael" == Michael Stefaniuc writes:
Michael> Fedora includes now a 64-bit Wine package (at least in F11)
Michael> which of course breaks existing Wine setups. "yum install wine"
Michael> will install the 64-bit version... Looks like we had our
Michael> WineConf too late f
Austin English wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>> Fedora includes now a 64-bit Wine package (at least in F11) which of course
>> breaks existing Wine setups. "yum install wine" will install the 64-bit
>> version... Looks like we had our WineConf too late for this.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Fedora includes now a 64-bit Wine package (at least in F11) which of course
> breaks existing Wine setups. "yum install wine" will install the 64-bit
> version... Looks like we had our WineConf too late for this.
>
> I have opened https://
Fedora includes now a 64-bit Wine package (at least in F11) which of
course breaks existing Wine setups. "yum install wine" will install the
64-bit version... Looks like we had our WineConf too late for this.
I have opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533988 for
this problem.
