"Nick Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok that is understandable -- but if wine takes up the entire 4gb
> address space -- where are builtin libs supposed to live ((be
> mapped)/alloc to)?
There is free space between 0x6000 and 0x8000.
> Why not let builtin libs (like opengl) use tha
ibs returned addresses in
that space? (not sure)
- Nick
From: Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nick Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: wine-devel@winehq.com
Subject: Re: Wine 32-bit address space
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:29:51 +0100
"Nick Burns" <[EMAI
"Nick Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The range 3GB (0xC000) - 4GB (0x) is considered system
> memory and apps should not write here (not sure why you would want to
> read from there either).
>
> But Wine tries to mmap this range (on Mac OSX at least)
>
> I was wondering why this
According to
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/aa366912.aspx
The range 3GB (0xC000) - 4GB (0x) is considered system memory
and apps should not write here (not sure why you would want to read from
there either).
But Wine tries to mmap this range (on Mac OSX at least)
I w
