Is it worth a few extra page impressions to dispose of the meaningful
version progress of Wine?
I would say no.
Wine will be popular regardless of its version string as long as it
continues to support a large set of applications. I'm of the stronger
opinion that we should be releasing our own pr
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:27:16 +0200
Remco wrote:
> How about, instead of calling the next major release version 1.2, call
> it version 2.0? The reason is purely marketing: an x.0 number will
> attract more press. Last major release was 1.0. It seems fitting to
> have the next major release be 2.0.
I would be fine with calling this wine 2.0, since it adds
a major new feature (64 bit compatibility).
How about, instead of calling the next major release version 1.2, call
it version 2.0? The reason is purely marketing: an x.0 number will
attract more press. Last major release was 1.0. It seems fitting to
have the next major release be 2.0. Besides, is there any reason to
have multiple levels of "
