On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know what the state of installing/running Office 2003 is,
> because I seem to recall there being a regression in this area. That
> is something that I would consider a blocker.
It installs fine, however almost not
2008/6/12 Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Reece Dunn wrote:
>>
>> 2008/6/11 Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> In short - that after everyone's hard work and 15 years of development
>>> wine-1.0 is just a release tag nothing more.
>>
>> I think that this is overly harsh. It's lik
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bugs may be deferred, but if the bugs aren't reported, no one
> knows to fix them, albeit not likely until after 1.0.
If I recall correctly the criteria for target applications was that
they be freely accessible such
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The bugs may be deferred, but if the bugs aren't reported, no one
> knows to fix them, albeit not likely until after 1.0.
>
> Not reporting bugs is the software equivalent of people who don't vote
> and expect politician
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
>>> <[EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Scott Ritchie wrote:
In any case, we should note why we
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>> In any case, we should note why we're making a release in the first
>>> place, and make it very clear that we believe
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>> In any case, we should note why we're making a release in the first
>>> place, and make it very clear that we believe
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> In any case, we should note why we're making a release in the first
>> place, and make it very clear that we believe Wine 1.0 to be the best
>> version of Wine yet in all cases (ie, no regressions
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Since all of the 1.0 blocker bugs being pushed back, wine-1.0 release notes
> should list all of those as major known problems. Otherwise people will get
> a bad impression that wine-1.0 means more then less working release.
>
> Also release notes shou
Scott Ritchie wrote:
> In any case, we should note why we're making a release in the first
> place, and make it very clear that we believe Wine 1.0 to be the best
> version of Wine yet in all cases (ie, no regressions).
I'd disagree on "the best" part. Looking at bugzilla and forum people thing
t
mean, how proud do we need to be about not running everything?
Susan
-Original Message-
>From: Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jun 11, 2008 8:02 PM
>To: Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: Wine Develop
>Subject: Re: Wine-1.0 release notes
>
>200
Reece Dunn wrote:
> 2008/6/11 Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> In short - that after everyone's hard work and 15 years of development
>> wine-1.0 is just a release tag nothing more.
>
> I think that this is overly harsh. It's like saying that you should
> not celebrate a birthday, as that
2008/6/11 Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In short - that after everyone's hard work and 15 years of development
> wine-1.0 is just a release tag nothing more.
I think that this is overly harsh. It's like saying that you should
not celebrate a birthday, as that is just you aging just a day
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Since all of the 1.0 blocker bugs being pushed back, wine-1.0 release notes
> should list all of those as major known problems. Otherwise people will get
> a bad impression that wine-1.0 means more then less working release.
>
> Also release notes shou
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short - that after everyone's hard work and 15 years of development
> wine-1.0 is just a release tag nothing more.
I think this deserves more discussion but I am not quite ready. I'll
post a reply on Monday as an RFC
Since all of the 1.0 blocker bugs being pushed back, wine-1.0 release notes
should list all of those as major known problems. Otherwise people will get
a bad impression that wine-1.0 means more then less working release.
Also release notes should mention that wine-1.0 is not suitable for most
17 matches
Mail list logo
