Re: Window management protocol extensions

2004-04-25 Thread Mike Hearn
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:59:44 +1000, David Hammerton wrote: > Just wanted to chime in here and remind you of our discussion on IRC > just then. I think this is a great idea and I sure do have a lot to say > on this topic (in terms of what I'd like to see in the spec) - but I > won't be able to go

Re: Window management protocol extensions

2004-04-24 Thread David Hammerton
Hi Mike, Just wanted to chime in here and remind you of our discussion on IRC just then. I think this is a great idea and I sure do have a lot to say on this topic (in terms of what I'd like to see in the spec) - but I won't be able to go over it for at least a week (probably longer). I'm sure

Window management protocol extensions

2004-04-24 Thread Mike Hearn
The latest WM problems caused by Metacity preventing windows from being moved offscreen prompted to raise the issue of having a Wine specific extension to the NETWM (EWMH) protocol into which we can easily add whatever semantics we need to map win32 windowing to X windowing more easily. The idea w