Jeff Latimer wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting
older Windows versions as guests (< NT4).
I don't understand VirtualBox says it supports up to Windows 7 and I
have XP running. I have had QEMU/KVM running XP. What annoyed me about
VM
Paul Vriens wrote:
The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting
older Windows versions as guests (< NT4).
I don't understand VirtualBox says it supports up to Windows 7 and I
have XP running. I have had QEMU/KVM running XP. What annoyed me about
VMWare Server was the b
Kai Blin wrote:
On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
virtual networks, and
2009/6/12 Kai Blin :
> On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
>> VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
>> its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
> If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
> virtual ne
On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
> VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
> its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
virtual networks, and every single ker
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens :
> Just installed VirtualBox and it does have snaphots but not so extensive as
> VMware. In VMware I have some W2K snapshots:
>
> - out-of-the-box
> - SP1
> - SP2
> - SP3
> - SP4 + Windows Update
>
> I can freely choose which I want to go to. Not so with VirtualBox I'm afraid
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:22 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/6/11 Austin English :
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>
>>> VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with
>>> lots of caveats and not really for anything else. Notably, OpenBSD
>>> doesn't wor
2009/6/11 Austin English :
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>> VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with
>> lots of caveats and not really for anything else. Notably, OpenBSD
>> doesn't work and the VirtualBox developers admit it but consider the
>>
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens :
> The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting older
> Windows versions as guests (< NT4).
Yeah. Try QEMU without KVM on a very fast host machine, your ancient
Windows should run just as well as it would on a 486 ;-)
- d.
On 06/11/2009 02:58 PM, David Gerard wrote:
2009/6/11 Michael Stefaniuc:
Paul Vriens wrote:
I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our
winetest and I really like the snapshot possibilities of VMware.
Suggestions, recommendations?
I'm using KVM/Qemu with libvirt
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with
> lots of caveats and not really for anything else. Notably, OpenBSD
> doesn't work and the VirtualBox developers admit it but consider the
> bug beneath their attention. It's
2009/6/11 Michael Stefaniuc :
> Paul Vriens wrote:
>> I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our
>> winetest and I really like the snapshot possibilities of VMware.
>> Suggestions, recommendations?
> I'm using KVM/Qemu with libvirt aka virt-manager. I have problems wi
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens :
> On 06/11/2009 11:30 AM, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
>>
>> 2009/6/11 Paul Vriens:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
>>> Workstation.
>>>
>>> VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
>>> fixing/patching
On 06/11/2009 11:30 AM, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens:
Hi,
Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
Workstation.
VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
fixing/patching things, again and again.
I need to run several Windows ve
Paul Vriens wrote:
Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
Workstation.
VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
fixing/patching things, again and again.
I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our
winetest and
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens :
> Hi,
>
> Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
> Workstation.
>
> VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
> fixing/patching things, again and again.
>
> I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) f
Hi,
Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware
Workstation.
VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of
fixing/patching things, again and again.
I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our
winetest and I really like
17 matches
Mail list logo
