I'm really sorry you guys feel that way. The complaints have been very
minimal overall. If I wasn't so busy I can spend more time on it. My
problem is that I don't want to go back to Hypermail either. It has
serious issues with security and its attachment handling. So any other
options/suggestions
On 9/2/05, Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to get the timestamps back into the mailing list archive? It is
> useful e.g. for regression testing to see when patches were committed to cvs.
Yeah, it's actually a showstopper for me too and I asked the same
thing. It's exac
No, it is not possible.
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 23:22 +0200, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2005 01:30 schrieb Jeremy Newman:
> > The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
> > Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
> >
> H
* On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> * On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> > * On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:43 +0100, Richard Cohen wrote:
> > >
> > > Dont't you mean text/x-patch?
> >
> > Right, I added both. Since some pass it as text/x-patch, and some pass
> > text/x-diff.
>
>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:22:21PM +0200, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2005 01:30 schrieb Jeremy Newman:
> > The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
> > Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
> >
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> tha
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:22:21PM +0200, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2005 01:30 schrieb Jeremy Newman:
> > The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
> > Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
> >
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> tha
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2005 01:30 schrieb Jeremy Newman:
> The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
> Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
>
Hi Jeremy,
thank you for the new webserver.
Is it possible to get the timestamps back into t
* On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> * On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:43 +0100, Richard Cohen wrote:
> >
> > Dont't you mean text/x-patch?
>
> Right, I added both. Since some pass it as text/x-patch, and some pass
> text/x-diff.
\m/
Works fine for me. Big thanks.
Sorry it took longer to retry the test. Had to work some.
Let's see what mailman does this time...
Ron
# MAKE distclean before a CVS update!
if [ -e cvs.log ]
then
if [ -e cvs.log.old ]
then
rm cvs.log.old
fi
mv cvs.log cvs.log.old
fi
make distclean
cvs update -PAd >cvs.log; less cvs.l
Right, I added both. Since some pass it as text/x-patch, and some pass
text/x-diff.
I haven't seen any complaints about the patches appearing inline, so I
assume that it is OK.
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:43 +0100, Richard Cohen wrote:
> Jeremy Newman wrote:
> > Interesting, when it does get the mim
Jeremy Newman wrote:
Interesting, when it does get the mime type, it inlines it for text
types. I'll add the mime type text/x-diff to /etc/mime.types and see
what happens.
Dont't you mean text/x-patch?
Richard
Interesting, when it does get the mime type, it inlines it for text
types. I'll add the mime type text/x-diff to /etc/mime.types and see
what happens.
Please try this email test again in about 5 minutes.
I'm not sure if people want the patches inline, maybe they do? Let me
know.
On Thu, 2005-09-
Try that, let me know if it's better. Note: web browses cache mime type
as well, so try a different .bin if needed.
I'll try it for now.
I played with mod_mime_magic as well, but was unable to get any joy out
of it. It is supposed to do what the command 'file' does and get the
mime type based on
In reading the FAQ at
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq04.046.htp
I came to the impression that the mime-type and extension must match. If they
don't
the extension is changed to .bin.
I checked /etc/mime.types on my etch system and there is no text/x-patch.
'diff' is
* On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> * On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 12:18 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
>
> If you are serious about taking on this issue. The best place to go is
> to check out the mailman CVS at:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/
Thanks.
> as policy I only use binary pa
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 12:18 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> * On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> > * On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 19:24 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> > The only way to work around that is for pipermail to use a cgi program
> > which would send the correct mime type when yo
* On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> * On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 19:24 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> >
> > Still winehq server/mail-manager converts the type to
> > "application/octet-stream".
>
> Pipermail stores all attachments in as .bin files.
> ..
> When you click the link, apache
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 19:24 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> Hm. The page shows it's type as "x-patch". Even pine on my mail server
> knows it is a text file which can be easily viewed. Still winehq
> server/mail-manager converts the type to "application/octet-stream".
> May it have somethin
* On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> * On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 20:30 -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> >
> > It looks like pipermail doesn't understand some files and converts
> > them to something.bin, which makes it hard to read.
> >
> > Here is an example:
> > http://www.winehq.com/pip
Interesting. Pipermail does not have any config that I can see to change
that. Looking at other mailing lists it looks like that is just how it
works.
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 20:30 -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 5:30:49 PM, Jeremy Newman wrote:
>
> > The webserver is bac
On 8/31/05, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/30/05, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeremy Newman wrote:
> > > The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
> > > Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
> >
> > Just be
On 8/30/05, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Newman wrote:
> > The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
> > Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
>
> Just because no one else has said it yet:
>
> Nice work, Jer!
http:/
Jeremy Newman wrote:
> The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
> Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
Just because no one else has said it yet:
Nice work, Jer!
(Jer is masking all the behind the scenese wrangling
he did with our two
Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 5:30:49 PM, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
> Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
It looks like pipermail doesn't understand some files and converts them to
something.bin, wh
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 18:30 -0500, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> What is still down:
> We use cvsupd to sync our CVS trees. I'm still working on getting this
> running on Debian Sarge. It is no longer included in Sarge so I
> installed the woody packages. Though I have been unable to get it
> working. Wha
Well, cvs.winehq.org is just a CNAME to www.winehq.org. They all point
to the same IP. Any of those hosts should work. Depending of course on
any stale DNS records at your name server. We prefer you use
cvs.winehq.org just in case down the road we do move it to a different
box or what have you.
On
Jeremy Newman wrote:
The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
Whats Up:
www.winehq.org website
bugs.winehq.org website
appdb.winehq.org website
FTP site
Anonymous CVS access
Anonymous CVS sti
Jeremy Newman wrote:
It works. You are probably still resolving to the old IP. That should
clear up shortly.
$ host winehq.org
winehq.org has address 209.32.141.3
$ cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wine co wine
cvs checkout: Updating wine
U wine/.cvsignore
U wine/ANNOUNCE
U wine/AUTHORS
It works. You are probably still resolving to the old IP. That should
clear up shortly.
$ host winehq.org
winehq.org has address 209.32.141.3
$ cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wine co wine
cvs checkout: Updating wine
U wine/.cvsignore
U wine/ANNOUNCE
U wine/AUTHORS
...
On Tue, 2005-08-30
The webserver is back online. There are still plenty of quirks to fix.
Feel free to bug me here on wine-devel about any issues that crop up.
Whats Up:
www.winehq.org website
bugs.winehq.org website
appdb.winehq.org website
FTP site
Anonymous CVS access
What is still down:
We use cvsupd to sync ou
30 matches
Mail list logo
