Nate Gallaher writes:
> Should --enable-maintainer-mode be purged then, or should some
> additional flag magic be added? I ran into this a long time ago as
> well and made the assumption that it had bitrotted.
Maintainer mode is meant to be used by the maintainer, i.e. by me. It
works just fine
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:28:17PM +0200, Octavian Voicu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Nate Gallaher
> wrote:
> > Should --enable-maintainer-mode be purged then, or should some additional
> > flag magic be added? I ran into this a long time ago as well and made the
> > assumption that
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Nate Gallaher
wrote:
> Should --enable-maintainer-mode be purged then, or should some additional
> flag magic be added? I ran into this a long time ago as well and made the
> assumption that it had bitrotted.
Actually, in my case the problem is with Ubuntu -- the
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Octavian Voicu writes:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile wine with --enable-maintainer-mode and I get
lots of errors like `ignoring return value of ‘xxx’, declared with
attribute warn_unused_result'. I would like to submit a few patches to
fix them.
Please don't
Octavian Voicu writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile wine with --enable-maintainer-mode and I get
> lots of errors like `ignoring return value of ‘xxx’, declared with
> attribute warn_unused_result'. I would like to submit a few patches to
> fix them.
Please don't. The warnings are spurious
Hello,
I'm trying to compile wine with --enable-maintainer-mode and I get
lots of errors like `ignoring return value of ‘xxx’, declared with
attribute warn_unused_result'. I would like to submit a few patches to
fix them.
I noticed there's a page on the wiki for this:
http://wiki.winehq.org/Ignor
