WineHQ: Re: WWN broken

2004-01-10 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On January 10, 2004 11:27 am, Brian Vincent (C) wrote: > Also, if anyone is bored and wants to do something easy, it might be > nice to change all references in the WWN issues from winehq.com to > winehq.org. I've just recently switched over to trying to be consistent > on the .org thing. There's

WWN broken

2004-01-10 Thread Brian Vincent (C)
Title: WWN broken > We scan the XMl with tidy before posting. What is odd is that tidy > reports the XML is valid, but yet PHP's XML parser barfs on it. Whatever > the case, I just patched it, so it should be fixed online soon. Whoops.  Sorry about that.  I was running out t

Re: WWN broken

2004-01-09 Thread Jeremy Newman
We scan the XMl with tidy before posting. What is odd is that tidy reports the XML is valid, but yet PHP's XML parser barfs on it. Whatever the case, I just patched it, so it should be fixed online soon. On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 08:56, Mike Hearn wrote: > XML error: not well-formed (invalid token) at

WWN broken

2004-01-09 Thread Mike Hearn
XML error: not well-formed (invalid token) at line 104 Looks like it contains a typo. I thought only 1 item was a bit strange :)