Rein Klazes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:33:49 -0600, you wrote:
if (num_startup)
+{
+num_startup--;
return 0;
+}
Yes, that is more correct. Re-reading the MSDN this is what should be
happening.
Changelog:
dlls/winsock: socket.c
dlls/winsock/te
Tuesday, November 29, 2005, 12:10:52 PM, Rein Klazes wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:33:49 -0600, you wrote:
>> if (num_startup)
>>+{
>>+num_startup--;
>> return 0;
>>+}
> Yes, that is more correct. Re-reading the MSDN this is what should be
> happening.
> Changelog:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:33:49 -0600, you wrote:
> if (num_startup)
>+{
>+num_startup--;
> return 0;
>+}
Yes, that is more correct. Re-reading the MSDN this is what should be
happening.
Changelog:
dlls/winsock: socket.c
dlls/winsock/tests : sock.c
(With
Rein Klazes wrote:
--- wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c 2005-11-24 17:00:02.0 +0100
+++ mywine/dlls/winsock/socket.c2005-11-29 14:58:24.0 +0100
@@ -830,8 +830,10 @@ int WINAPI WSAStartup(WORD wVersionReque
*/
INT WINAPI WSACleanup(void)
{
-if (num_startup)
+if (num_st
