I think it is still possible to implement meaningful error messages. A
good overview of how this can be done is here:
http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~jeffery/merr.html.
Anyway, if you disagree, I will resend patch with explicit error check.
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
I think checking values explicitl
Saveliy Tretiakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ChangeLog:
> Saveliy Tretiakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> - Add missing ignore attribute.
> - Check for inapplicable attributes in typedef. Changed attribute
> parsing in a way Mike McCormack suggested.
> - Register type alias in typelib, if ATTR_PUBLIC i
Saveliy Tretiakov wrote:
+typedef: tTYPEDEF m_attributes type pident_list {
+ attr_t *a = $2;
+ int public = 0;
+ while(a){
+ switch(a->t
Saveliy Tretiakov wrote:
Sorry, previous patch was broken.
ChangeLog:
Saveliy Tretiakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Add missing ignore attribute.
Check for inapplicable attributes in typedef.
Register type in typelibrary only when ATTR_PUBLIC is set.
Please respect the indentation style in the files
