Re: [PATCH 2/7] qedit/tests: Use the W version of FindResource().

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2455 Your paranoid andr

Re: ntdll: Fix the version reported for 64-bit Windows XP.

0}, > +1, 0, VER_SUITE_SINGLEUSERTS, VER_NT_WORKSTATION, 0 > +}, > +#else > { > sizeof(RTL_OSVERSIONINFOEXW), 5, 1, 0xA28, VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, > {'S','e','r','v','i','c','e',

Re: [2/2] oleaut32: LoadRegTypeLib() should check actual typelib version

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2330 Your paranoid andr

Re: [PATCH] gdi32: Ask for a newer FreeType version

Detlef Riekenberg writes: > @@ -3686,7 +3686,8 @@ static BOOL init_freetype(void) > WINE_MESSAGE( >"Wine cannot find the FreeType font library. To enable Wine to\n" >"use TrueType fonts please install a version of FreeType greater > than\

Re: msvcp90: Prefer native version.

On Fri, 17 May 2013 10:43:29 +0200 Piotr Caban wrote: > On the other hand there are other benefits of preferring builtin dlls > over native ones. Thanks to it the dll is tested by more users. Because > there are no reported bugs related to msvcr90 I would prefer to use > builtin dll in this ca

Re: msvcp90: Prefer native version.

On 05/17/13 10:47, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Piotr Caban wrote: Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do. ... msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX dlls when native msvcp90 is installed. Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls? As f

Re: msvcp90: Prefer native version.

Piotr Caban wrote: > >>> Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do. > > ... > >> msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX > >> dlls when native msvcp90 is installed. > > > > Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls? > > > As far as I remember m

Re: msvcp90: Prefer native version.

On 05/17/13 10:22, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Piotr Caban wrote: Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do. ... msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX dlls when native msvcp90 is installed. Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls? As f

Re: msvcp90: Prefer native version.

Piotr Caban wrote: > > Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do. ... > msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX > dlls when native msvcp90 is installed. Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls? -- Dmitry.

Re: msvcp90: Prefer native version.

"(%p,%u,%p)\n", hinstDLL, fdwReason, lpvReserved); switch (fdwReason) { +case DLL_WINE_PREATTACH: +return FALSE; /* prefer native version */ + case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH: init_cxx_funcs(); init_lockit(); msvcp90 has some w

Re: Re : Full software of Wine version 1.4

- Every time i tried to connect - less than a second later - it cuts it right off. I have tried get help with the ubuntu website and provider - no such luck at this point of time. There is no such issue with version 11.04. Some companies refrain from updating their software because of that.. or d

Re : Full software of Wine version 1.4

here is no such issue with version 11.04. I am forced to re-install and restore from backup - the wine program that I backed up wont even load so I am forced to download at least 170mb (and at least 1 hour to download from your headquaters website which I am tired of downloading the last 30 times -

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

-- On Fri, May 3, 2013 00:35 BST Rosanne DiMesio wrote: >On Thu, 2 May 2013 23:26:24 +0100 (BST) >Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> >> - "volunteer" is what it means: "volunteer". To try to make anybody >> "volunteer" in any activity any manner which is less than whole-he

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

On Thu, 2 May 2013 23:26:24 +0100 (BST) Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > > - "volunteer" is what it means: "volunteer". To try to make anybody > "volunteer" in any activity any manner which is less than whole-heartedly > willingly, sounds wrong. > Nobody's trying to make anyone volunteer. I doubt anyon

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

--- On Thu, 2/5/13, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: From: Frédéric Delanoy Subject: Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers To: "Rosanne DiMesio" , "André Hentschel" Cc: "Wine Devel" Date: Thursday, 2 May, 2013, 18:53

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2013 17:57:16 +0200 > Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > > > > > This won't prevent it, but I'm not sure hiding/disabling comments won't > do > > more harm than good. > > My opinion, based on close to 5 years experience as an active Ap

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2013 11:35:28 +0200 > Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > > Furthermore, there's already a comment telling sthg along the lines of > > "this program wasn't tested with a recent wine version&qu

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

nes of > "this program wasn't tested with a recent wine version". > Isn't that sufficient already? > How exactly is that going to prevent spam in comments? -- Rosanne DiMesio

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

l be lost/invisible? That seems a bit harsh: you probably can't expect users to follow workarounds scattered across associated bugs, can you? Furthermore, there's already a comment telling sthg along the lines of "this program wasn't tested with a recent wine version". Isn't that sufficient already? Frédéric

Re: [AppDB]: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

Hi list, > Forced moderation of comments could work for apps with maintainers > who are doing their job, but most of the spam I recently deleted was > in unmaintained apps. This will be the first step towards a better maintained AppDB! > My suggestion would be to block comments > altogether on u

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

> > So volunteer to be a maintainer. > > > > > That is all good and well, but most of the time I check the wine page > before I buy a game. If there are no maintainers and this is active, > there will be no comments, I will be unsure about the likelihood of it > working. Reports would still be

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:47:25 -0400 Christopher Cope wrote: > I understand the premise, but I disagree. A lot of apps that I use don't have > maintainers. However, the comments are typically helpful. I believe this > should be approached differently. > So volunteer to be a maintainer. -- Ro

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers

> include/version.php |9 ++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/include/version.php b/include/version.php >index 8f02b24..bf1d7ab 100644 >--- a/include/version.php >+++ b/include/version.php >@@ -1180,9 +1180,12 @@ class version { >

Re: tools: add ProductId to the Windows NT Current Version block

Sorry answered the wrong question. No I do not know why the lack of the key causes the app to fail. -aric Sent from my iPhone. On Apr 10, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Codeweavers writes: > >> It is the same value hard coded in the non WindowsNT current v

Re: tools: add ProductId to the Windows NT Current Version block

Any just systems 2012 program. Ichitaro 2013 and homepage builder 2013 are the two specific ones. -aric Sent from my iPhone. On Apr 10, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Codeweavers writes: > >> It is the same value hard coded in the non WindowsNT current v

Re: tools: add ProductId to the Windows NT Current Version block

Codeweavers writes: > It is the same value hard coded in the non WindowsNT current version block. That probably wasn't a good idea either. Do you know what your app is using this for? -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org

Re: tools: add ProductId to the Windows NT Current Version block

It is the same value hard coded in the non WindowsNT current version block. -aric Sent from my iPhone. On Apr 9, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Aric Stewart writes: > >> @@ -3019,6 +3019,7 @@ HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%,"CSDVersion",2,"Service Pack 3

Re: tools: add ProductId to the Windows NT Current Version block

Aric Stewart writes: > @@ -3019,6 +3019,7 @@ HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%,"CSDVersion",2,"Service Pack 3" > HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%,"CurrentBuildNumber",2,"2600" > HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%,"CurrentType",2,"Uniprocessor Free" > HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%,"ProductName",2,"Microsoft Windows XP" > +HKLM,%C

Re: Raise the minimum version of FreeBSD to 8.0.

On 04-03-2013 01:54, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> We've had this as a requirement in the FreeBSD ports for quite a >> while (and the Wiki describes some background). >> >> Gerald >> --- >> - FreeBSD 7.0 or later >> + FreeBSD 8.0 or later >>

Re: Raise the minimum version of FreeBSD to 8.0.

gt; - Wine will generally not work properly on versions before FreeBSD 7.0. > + Wine will generally not work properly on versions before FreeBSD 8.0. You should also change the version in the various README.xx translations (in 'documentation' directory). Frédéric

Re: macdrv: implement getting and setting the screen saver state, version 6

On Jan 22, 2013, at 5:33 PM, C.W. Betts wrote: > Yet another fix. Looks good to me. Thanks for doing this and for putting up with me. Cheers, Ken

Re: macdrv: implement getting and setting the screen saver state, version 5

On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:22 PM, C.W. Betts wrote: > This version should fix the problems you mentioned Sorry about this – I should have thought about this last time – but I think you shouldn't fall through in the SPI_SETSCREENSAVEACTIVE case. It's asking for trouble in the futur

Re: macdrv: implement getting and setting the screen saver state, version 4

Hi, On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:21 PM, C.W. Betts wrote: > This version falls through in SPI_SETSCREENSAVEACTIVE. Sadly, you used C++ style for the fall-through comment. :-/ Also, you have some trailing whitespace and the patch no longer applies cleanly after today's commits of mine. It s

Re: macdrv: implement getting and setting the screen saver state, version 3

On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:50 AM, C.W. Betts wrote: > This version gets rid of redundant comments. According to Alexandre's comment on your X11 driver patch, you should be returning FALSE from the "SET" case so that user32 will update the registry. Otherwise, looking good. -Ken

Re: macdrv: implement getting and setting the screen saver state, version 2

On Jan 21, 2013, at 9:31 AM, C.W. Betts wrote: > On Jan 20, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Ken Thomases wrote: > >> I'm not sure it's correct that these are two different names for roughly the >> same thing. I think the two assertion types do slightly different things. >> "NoDisplaySleep" seeks to preve

Re: macdrv: implement getting and setting the screen saver state, version 2

On Jan 20, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Ken Thomases wrote: > Hi, > > On Jan 20, 2013, at 2:00 PM, C.W. Betts wrote: > >> This version implements changes and advice from Ken Thomases, including >> using kIOPMAssertionTypePreventUserIdleDisplaySleep on Lion and later. Also, >

Re: configure.ac: check for a good enough version of libv4l1.h (try 2)

Damjan Jovanovic writes: > @@ -676,6 +676,22 @@ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([linux/videodev.h linux/videodev2.h > libv4l1.h],,, > #include > #endif]) > > +dnl Check for libv4l1.h > +if test "x$with_v4l" != "xno" > +then > +ac_save_CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS" > +if test "$PKG_CONFIG" != "fal

Re: macdrv: implement getting and setting the screen saver state, version 2

Hi, On Jan 20, 2013, at 2:00 PM, C.W. Betts wrote: > This version implements changes and advice from Ken Thomases, including using > kIOPMAssertionTypePreventUserIdleDisplaySleep on Lion and later. Also, some > comments were added. > +//Get pre-Lion no display

Re: [PATCH 2/3] vbscript: Added VBScript.RegExp version 5.5 typelib

Hi Piotr, On 01/18/13 11:48, Piotr Caban wrote: > +#define DISPID_SUBMATCHES_ITEM 0 > +#define DISPID_SUBMATCHES_COUNT 1 > +#define DISPID_SUBMATCHES__NEWENUM -4 > + > +#define DISPID_MATCHCOLLECTION_ITEM 0 > +#define DISPID_MATCHCOLLECTION_COUNT1 > +#define D

Re: [PATCH 1/3] atl: Allow version-based differences in struct layouts

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23310 Your paranoid android

Re: msxml3: Implement xmldecl-version property for a reader

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21252 Your paranoid android

Re: winhttp: Always use the 64-bit version of IActiveScriptParse.

Hi Hans, This won't work on 32-bit. 32-bit JScript exposes only IActiveScriptParse32. That's an example where using inline macros complicates the code. See dlls/mshtml/script.c for how I dealt with this problem. Jacek

Re: [PATCH 1/2] joystick.cpl: First version of the joystick configuration applet

Lucas Zawacki writes: >> It's called joy.cpl on Windows. Please also use compatible exports, and >> avoid creating a lot of empty source files. I'd expect that a single >> source file is sufficient for this. > > Will do. I removed the uneeded shlwapi and advapi32 from the exports > is that enough

Re: [PATCH 1/2] joystick.cpl: First version of the joystick configuration applet

> It's called joy.cpl on Windows. Please also use compatible exports, and > avoid creating a lot of empty source files. I'd expect that a single > source file is sufficient for this. Will do. I removed the uneeded shlwapi and advapi32 from the exports is that enough or am I missing something?

Re: [PATCH 1/2] joystick.cpl: First version of the joystick configuration applet

Lucas Fialho Zawacki writes: > From: Lucas Fialho Zawacki > > This adds a control panel applet to configure the joysticks. It is > a property sheet and has 3 pages: > > * Joystick listing > * Axes and Button Testing > * Force Feedback testing > > All the function are stubs at the moment, the pan

Re: [PATCH 1/5] programs: First version of the joystick testing tool. Just lists connected joysticks.

Lucas Fialho Zawacki writes: > From: Lucas Fialho Zawacki > > --- > configure.ac |1 + > programs/joystick/Makefile.in | 17 +++ > programs/joystick/main.c | 102 > + > 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+) > create mode 10

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

On 5/1/12 2:32 AM, Eric Pouech wrote: This is the downside people in this thread are complaining about: compiling 32-bit programs on a 64-bit Ubuntu install is now slightly more difficult. However, Wine is currently the _only_ piece of software I've encountered that needs to be built for both a

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

This is the downside people in this thread are complaining about: compiling 32-bit programs on a 64-bit Ubuntu install is now slightly more difficult. However, Wine is currently the _only_ piece of software I've encountered that needs to be built for both arches on the same machine in order

Re: Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

dual x86_64 : i386 setup this is an updated version to what I already sent to scott ritchie of course this is not a step by step installation I forgot to mention that ubuntu devels did a crappy job in 12.04 I'm really starting to get angry at their inability to take care of upward compat in

Re: Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

On 4/30/12 2:17 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote: On 04/29/2012 10:44 PM, Eric Pouech wrote: for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile That's funny because I just tried yesterday and filed [1] to see what dev

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

On 4/30/12 1:37 AM, Eric Pouech wrote: This is because you _cannot_ install the 32-bit -dev packages onto 12.04. It's not just symlinks that are missing, many of the header files are different between the arches. I'm not sure this is a generic rule, and if it were, then exclusion between i386 a

Re: Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

386 setup >> >> this is an updated version to what I already sent to scott ritchie >> of course this is not a step by step installation > I forgot to mention that ubuntu devels did a crappy job in 12.04 > I'm really starting to get angry at their inability to take care of >

Re: Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

On 04/29/2012 10:44 PM, Eric Pouech wrote: Warning at compilation -- when compiling, some warnings still have to be worked upon /home/eric/work/wine/dlls/winex11.drv/keyboard.c:1109:5: warning: 'XKeycodeToKeysym' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h:1695) [-Wde

Re: Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

On 04/29/2012 10:44 PM, Eric Pouech wrote: for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile That's funny because I just tried yesterday and filed [1] to see what developers think. They are aware of the issue b

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Eric Pouech wrote: >> This is because you _cannot_ install the 32-bit -dev packages onto >> 12.04.  It's not just symlinks that are missing, many of the header >> files are different between the arches. > I'm not sure this is a generic rule, and if it were, then e

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

> This is because you _cannot_ install the 32-bit -dev packages onto > 12.04. It's not just symlinks that are missing, many of the header > files are different between the arches. I'm not sure this is a generic rule, and if it were, then exclusion between i386 and x86_64 should be defined on most

Re: Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

if you want to have a dual x86_64 : i386 setup >> >> this is an updated version to what I already sent to scott ritchie >> of course this is not a step by step installation >> > I forgot to mention that ubuntu devels did a crappy job in 12.04 > I'm really starting to ge

Re: Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

Le 29/04/2012 22:44, Eric Pouech a écrit : for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile This could be useful if you want to have a dual x86_64 : i386 setup this is an updated version to what I al

Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)

for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile This could be useful if you want to have a dual x86_64 : i386 setup this is an updated version to what I already sent to scott ritchie of course this is

Re: [PATCH 3/3] comctl32: Truncate the info tip text when using ANSI version messages.

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17802 Your paranoid android

Re: winspool.drv: Update allowed driver Version

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17541 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH] configure: Check if version of msgfmt (from gettext) is recent enough by checking features (try 2).

On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Christian Costa wrote: [...] > +dnl Check the msgfmt version > +if test "$MSGFMT" = "msgfmt" > +then > + AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether msgfmt (from gettext) is recent enough]) The comment and message should be more something like 'checkin

Re: [PATCH] configure: Check if version of msgfmt/gettext is recent enough (at least 0.15).

Le 02/03/2012 18:02, Alexandre Julliard a écrit : Christian Costa writes: @@ -284,6 +284,25 @@ AC_CHECK_PROGS(CONVERT, convert, false) AC_CHECK_PROGS(ICOTOOL, icotool, false) AC_CHECK_PROGS(MSGFMT, msgfmt, false) +dnl Check the msgfmt version +if test "$MSGFMT" = &quo

Re: [PATCH] configure: Check if version of msgfmt/gettext is recent enough (at least 0.15).

Christian Costa writes: > @@ -284,6 +284,25 @@ AC_CHECK_PROGS(CONVERT, convert, false) > AC_CHECK_PROGS(ICOTOOL, icotool, false) > AC_CHECK_PROGS(MSGFMT, msgfmt, false) > > +dnl Check the msgfmt version > +if test "$MSGFMT" = "msgfmt" > +then >

Re: [PATCH 4/8 try2] jscript: Added bytecode version of try statement

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16182 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 4/8] jscript: Added bytecode version of try statement

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16180 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 2/5] d3d9: Limit VS/PS reported version.

On 24 October 2011 18:58, Matteo Bruni wrote: > +    if (pCaps->VertexShaderVersion > D3DVS_VERSION(3,0)) > +        pCaps->VertexShaderVersion = D3DVS_VERSION(3,0); > +    if (pCaps->PixelShaderVersion > D3DPS_VERSION(3,0)) > +        pCaps->PixelShaderVersion = D3DPS_VERSION(3,0); > + This shoul

Re: [PATCH 1/5] d3d8: Limit VS/PS reported version.

On 24 October 2011 18:58, Matteo Bruni wrote: > +    if (pCaps->VertexShaderVersion > D3DVS_VERSION(1,1)) > +        pCaps->VertexShaderVersion = D3DVS_VERSION(1,1); > +    if (pCaps->PixelShaderVersion > D3DPS_VERSION(1,4)) > +        pCaps->PixelShaderVersion = D3DPS_VERSION(1,4); > + fixup_caps

Re: ubuntu ppa -- nice to have on development version too

On 09/03/2011 03:54 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote: > On 09/02/2011 10:04 AM, Susan Cragin wrote: >> There was discussion about putting a daily wine build on the ubuntu ppa. >> I'd like to put in a word for having it on the development version >> (currently oneiric) as well as

Re: ubuntu ppa -- nice to have on development version too

On 09/02/2011 10:04 AM, Susan Cragin wrote: > There was discussion about putting a daily wine build on the ubuntu ppa. > I'd like to put in a word for having it on the development version (currently > oneiric) as well as the stable version (natty). > Right now wine only seem

ubuntu ppa -- nice to have on development version too

There was discussion about putting a daily wine build on the ubuntu ppa. I'd like to put in a word for having it on the development version (currently oneiric) as well as the stable version (natty). Right now wine only seems to have a natty ppa.

Re: kernel32: Improve GetVolumeInformation filesystem flags I set flags value according to my tests which may differ from a windows version to another.

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:41 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote: >> You probably also want to use shorter subject lines, >> and move more of the patch description into the body >> of your message. >> > When I wrote the description of the patch using git commit, I wrote > "kernel32: Improve GetVolumeInform

Re: kernel32: Improve GetVolumeInformation filesystem flags I set flags value according to my tests which may differ from a windows version to another.

On 08/29/2011 02:49 PM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 14:41, GOUJON Alexandre wrote: When I wrote the description of the patch using git commit, I wrote "kernel32: Improve GetVolumeInformation filesystem flags" as the title and the remaining part on a new line (to make it a co

Re: kernel32: Improve GetVolumeInformation filesystem flags I set flags value according to my tests which may differ from a windows version to another.

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 14:41, GOUJON Alexandre wrote: > When I wrote the description of the patch using git commit, I wrote > "kernel32: Improve GetVolumeInformation filesystem flags" as the title and > the remaining part on a new line (to make it a comment). > If I look at my commit with GitWeb

Re: kernel32: Improve GetVolumeInformation filesystem flags I set flags value according to my tests which may differ from a windows version to another.

On 08/29/2011 04:46 AM, Dan Kegel wrote: Fails to build here, since it depends on the patch "include/winnet.h: Add more GetVolumeInformation system flags", but you didn't mark them as being part of a series. See "Subject Line" in http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches volume.c: In function ‘Ge

re: kernel32: Improve GetVolumeInformation filesystem flags I set flags value according to my tests which may differ from a windows version to another.

Fails to build here, since it depends on the patch "include/winnet.h: Add more GetVolumeInformation system flags", but you didn't mark them as being part of a series. See "Subject Line" in http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches volume.c: In function ‘GetVolumeInformationW’: volume.c:672: error:

Re: [PATCH] version: mark internal function with hidden visibility

Marcus Meissner writes: > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static BOOL find_pe_resource( HFILE lzfd, DWORD *resLen, > DWORD *resOff ) > /*** > * find_version_resource [internal] > */ > -DWORD find_version_resource( HFI

riched20/tests: Beginnings of EM_SETMARGINS test. This patch is released into the Public Domain under the requirements of the LGPL version 2.1 or later. Released by James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@gmail.c

Just checking if gmail has a 'wrapping' problem or if this will actually go through. riched20/tests: Beginnings of EM_SETMARGINS test. This patch is released into the Public Domain under the requirements of the LGPL version 2.1 or later. Released by James McKenzie jjmckenzi...

Re: winegcc preprocessor macro containing wine version?

rocessor macro pre-defined by >> winegcc that holds the Wine version? > > #include "config.h" > gives you PACKAGE_VERSION, but that's a string. > > Looking at 'git blame commctrl.h, I see that MCM_SETCALENDARBORDER > is a preprocessor symbol of similar vin

re: winegcc preprocessor macro containing wine version?

Robert McDonald asked: > I want to be able to define a structure if I'm compiling with Wine 1.2.2 > but not with Wine 1.3.15, since the structure definition exists in the > latter but not the former. Is there a preprocessor macro pre-defined by > winegcc that holds the Wine v

winegcc preprocessor macro containing wine version?

I want to be able to define a structure if I'm compiling with Wine 1.2.2 but not with Wine 1.3.15, since the structure definition exists in the latter but not the former. Is there a preprocessor macro pre-defined by winegcc that holds the Wine version? Maybe that's not the best

Re: [3/3] msi: Assume a file is present if the target exists with the same size and there's no file version or hash to verif

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9778 Your paranoid android.

Re: [5/5] msi: Manage one assembly cache per major version of the .NET runtime.

On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:57 -0600, Vincent Povirk wrote: > > +static const WCHAR szVersion11[] = > > {'v','1','.','1','.','4','3','2','2',0}; > > +static const WCHAR szVersion20[] = > > {'v','2','.','0','.','5','0','7','2','7',0}; > > No v4.0.30319 ? Not yet. It doesn't install so I can

Re: [5/5] msi: Manage one assembly cache per major version of the .NET runtime.

> +    static const WCHAR szVersion11[] = > {'v','1','.','1','.','4','3','2','2',0}; > +    static const WCHAR szVersion20[] = > {'v','2','.','0','.','5','0','7','2','7',0}; No v4.0.30319 ?

wineqtdecoder: Initial version of the video decoder using Mac OS/X QuickTime Framework.

Aric, your post 1.3.9 patch needs additional autoconf help to detect systems where the QT framework developer files are not installed. wine fails to build here (MacOS 10.5.8) qtvdecoder.c:63:40: error: QuickTime/ImageCompression.h: No such file or directory qtvdecoder.c:139: error: expected spec

Re: [PATCH 2/2] jscript: Added ScriptEngine*Version functions implementation

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7836 Your paranoid android.

Re: Hebrew version of Wine History

On 12/24/2010 01:32 AM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote: Hey, I translated the Wine History into Hebrew several weeks ago and I noticed that although the patches are in, when I click on Wine's History on the Hebrew website I'm being taken to the English version of the document in Wine's

Hebrew version of Wine History

Hey, I translated the Wine History into Hebrew several weeks ago and I noticed that although the patches are in, when I click on Wine's History on the Hebrew website I'm being taken to the English version of the document in Wine's wiki. Wine's history is pretty important to t

Re: The Windows version of the "octave --version" command exposes an uncommon X network transparency issue for wine

Alan W. Irwin wrote: wineconsole --backend=curses MinGW/msys/1.0/bin/bash.exe Under that bash if I set the PATH to include the bin directory where octave.exe resides and run octave --version directly (i.e., not from an X-terminal) I get a good result which consists of the usual GNU octave

Re: [wine-devel] Re: The Windows version of the "octave --version" command exposes an uncommon X network transparency issue for wine

On 2010-12-21 14:33+0100 André Hentschel wrote: Am 21.12.2010 00:42, schrieb Alan W. Irwin: This just-encountered network-transparency trouble occurred for the Windows version of octave, and the reason I am bringing it up here is to find out if this is a known issue or a new bug that I should

Re: The Windows version of the "octave --version" command exposes an uncommon X network transparency issue for wine

I have not done any such tests for > games. > > This just-encountered network-transparency trouble occurred for the > Windows version of octave, and the reason I am bringing it up here is > to find out if this is a known issue or a new bug that I should report > on your bug tracke

The Windows version of the "octave --version" command exposes an uncommon X network transparency issue for wine

trouble occurred for the Windows version of octave, and the reason I am bringing it up here is to find out if this is a known issue or a new bug that I should report on your bug tracker. Here are the details. I am running a 32-bit version of wine-1.3.9 that I have built and installed on Debian

Re: [1/2] version: zero pad section up to virtual size

Ričardas Barkauskas writes: > @@ -282,8 +282,12 @@ static BOOL find_pe_resource( HFILE lzfd, DWORD *resLen, > DWORD *resOff ) > } > > /* Read in resource section */ > -resSectionSize = sections[i].SizeOfRawData; > -resSection = HeapAlloc( GetProcessHeap(), 0, resSectionSize )

Re: New version of exe-thumbnailer (0.7)

ve Windows's idea of drive mappings which is probably different from Wine. Damjan Jovanovic Agreed - the gnome version does look much better at the moment. Thumbnailing LNK files is done by doing a simple parse of the LNK file, and then using wine's winepath command to convert that in

Re: New version of exe-thumbnailer (0.7)

les". > > I've also got code on the KDE reviewboard that'll take care of LNK files - > if it gets picked up, that'll be natively supported by KDE too... > I got it to work, but it's a bit strange since I must activate Preview for the folder to actually get the i

Re: New version of exe-thumbnailer (0.7)

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Nicholas van Oudtshoorn wrote: > On 10/04/2010 08:39 AM, Octavian Voicu wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Scott Ritchie > > wrote: >> >>    Includes much prettier icons, support for Vista icons (with icoutils >>    0.29.1) and

Re: New version of exe-thumbnailer (0.7)

On 10/03/2010 07:07 PM, Nicholas van Oudtshoorn wrote: > On 10/04/2010 08:39 AM, Octavian Voicu wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Scott Ritchie > > wrote: >> >> Includes much prettier icons, support for Vista icons (with icoutils >> 0.29.1) and more. >>

Re: New version of exe-thumbnailer (0.7)

On 10/04/2010 08:39 AM, Octavian Voicu wrote: On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Scott Ritchie mailto:sc...@open-vote.org>> wrote: Includes much prettier icons, support for Vista icons (with icoutils 0.29.1) and more. Screenshots and a description are at: http://wiki.winehq.org/ex

Re: New version of exe-thumbnailer (0.7)

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Includes much prettier icons, support for Vista icons (with icoutils > 0.29.1) and more. > > Screenshots and a description are at: > http://wiki.winehq.org/exe-thumbnailer Nice! Any plans for Kubuntu / KDE support? :) Octavian

New version of exe-thumbnailer (0.7)

Includes much prettier icons, support for Vista icons (with icoutils 0.29.1) and more. Screenshots and a description are at: http://wiki.winehq.org/exe-thumbnailer -Scott Ritchie

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >