Re: VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion bug fix

2004-12-15 Thread William Lahti
Upon further review, the patch works. Stupid me. William

Re: VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion bug fix

2004-12-13 Thread Ivan Leo Puoti
>I just tried Ivan's patch on my program, and get the same insufficient >version >error that I was getting with the original, unpatched, version. My >original patch did not have this problem. Why don't you add a few traces to see what's going on? I've already explained that your orginal patch is wr

Re: VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion bug fix

2004-12-13 Thread William Lahti
I just tried Ivan's patch on my program, and get the same insufficient version error that I was getting with the original, unpatched, version. My original patch did not have this problem. William

Re: VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion bug fix

2004-12-13 Thread Ivan Leo Puoti
> It was 4. Pehaps there is yet another bug someplace else. That's why in my updated patch I check the OS using the available info. It's here, you may want to try it out and check if it works for you app http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/12/att-0275/01-wkivcf2.diff You patch was wro

Re: VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion bug fix

2004-12-13 Thread William Lahti
I actually test-ran my version of the patch with VB .NET's installer, which requires 2K or higher, where the other version was only compile-tested. It fixed the problem of the installer saying that I needed WIN2K or higher. I had actually tried exactly what Andreas Mohr had before coming up with th

Re: VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion bug fix

2004-12-13 Thread Andreas Mohr
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 03:09:29PM +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote: > > I fixed a bug in ntdll's VERSION_GetLinkedDllVersion which caused it to > > not be able to return any Windows version higher than WIN98. It has now been > > extended for WIN2K, WINXP, and WIN2K3. This function would eventually be >