Hi!
Wine had support for reading win2000 registry files once. It was dropped
some time ago. I had implemented it around 1999/2000.
Have a look in the CVS.
Bye
Juergen
> Hi Martin,
> Thanks for this info. It looks like this might work. How do I contact
> Eric Kohl?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On
Brad DeMorrow wrote:
James Liggett wrote:
Brad,
Last night Martin Fuchs suggested that we look into using ReactOS's
registry format in order to be compatible with Windows registry
databases.
I'm really not convinced that we need to be compatible with
Windows' registry file format at that
> Hi Martin,
> Thanks for this info. It looks like this might work. How do I contact
> Eric Kohl?
>
> Thanks,
> James
This is his email address: Eric Kohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perhaps you should also send a note to the ReactOS Development List.
Regards,
Martin
> On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 17:57
Hi Martin,
Thanks for this info. It looks like this might work. How do I contact
Eric Kohl?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 17:57 +0200, Martin Fuchs wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> > Last night Martin Fuchs suggested that we look into using ReactOS's
> > registry format in order to be compatible wit
Anssi Hannula wrote:
Brad DeMorrow wrote:
Brian Vincent wrote:
On 6/21/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
of work. But, I do agree with all of your points. I think the current
system could use some improvement, especially in the area of
searching.
Let me know what you think o
Brian,
I too think that's an excellent idea. I don't think that'll be too hard
to do, seeing as .reg files are simple text files if I recall right.
James
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 09:52 -0600, Brian Vincent wrote:
> On 6/21/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > of work. But, I do agree wi
Brad DeMorrow wrote:
Brian Vincent wrote:
On 6/21/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
of work. But, I do agree with all of your points. I think the current
system could use some improvement, especially in the area of searching.
Let me know what you think of all this.
While we'r
Brian Vincent wrote:
On 6/21/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
of work. But, I do agree with all of your points. I think the current
system could use some improvement, especially in the area of searching.
Let me know what you think of all this.
While we're on the topic on t
Hi James,
> Last night Martin Fuchs suggested that we look into using ReactOS's
> registry format in order to be compatible with Windows registry
> databases. I have the latest release of ReactOS running on QEMU on my
> box, so I checked it out. Basically, they're using the same regedit
> program
On 6/21/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> of work. But, I do agree with all of your points. I think the current
> system could use some improvement, especially in the area of searching.
> Let me know what you think of all this.
While we're on the topic on the registry..
In addition t
James Liggett wrote:
Brad,
Last night Martin Fuchs suggested that we look into using ReactOS's
registry format in order to be compatible with Windows registry
databases.
I'm really not convinced that we need to be compatible with Windows'
registry file format at that level. . . That would
Brad,
Last night Martin Fuchs suggested that we look into using ReactOS's
registry format in order to be compatible with Windows registry
databases. I have the latest release of ReactOS running on QEMU on my
box, so I checked it out. Basically, they're using the same regedit
program from Wine, miss
12 matches
Mail list logo