Re: Updated debug delay patch

2004-03-15 Thread Mike Hearn
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:22:32 +0100, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > Mike, > > it looks like the patch dosen't turn on debugging for new processes that > where started after debugging for the parent process was turned on... Good point, I hadn't thought of that. Not sure what the best way to fix that is ... if

Re: Updated debug delay patch

2004-03-14 Thread Rein Klazes
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:14:48 +0100, you wrote: > > this patch comes like sent from heaven. However: > > > cat ../delay_debug | patch -s -p0 --dry-run > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dlls/ntdll/debugtools.c.rej > 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file libs/wine/debu

Re: Updated debug delay patch

2004-03-14 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Mike" == Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> Here is the updated version of my debug delay patch, back by Mike> popular request (well, ok, one person asked for it :) Mike> Usage is simple: Mike> WINEDELAY=1 WINEDEBUG=+relay wine foobar.exe Mike> Hit f12 in an

Re: Updated debug delay patch

2004-03-14 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Mike" == Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> Here is the updated version of my debug delay patch, back by Mike> popular request (well, ok, one person asked for it :) Mike> Usage is simple: Mike> WINEDELAY=1 WINEDEBUG=+relay wine foobar.exe Mike> Hit f12 in an