On 06/28/12 16:33, Francois Gouget wrote:
Actually there are some implementation differences between msvcp60's and
msvcp90's misc.c code. In particular for the init_lockit(),
free_lockit() and various _Lockit_ctor_*() functions. Are the two
implementations supposed to be identical?
I forgot that
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Piotr Caban wrote:
[...]
> The function were not removed to make msvcp60 and msvcp90 more similar
> (and probably because I didn't use -Wunused-function option). Thanks to
> it one can copy misc.c file between the dlls when it's modified.
Actually there are some implementati
On 06/28/12 09:30, Francois Gouget wrote:
I get the following warnings when compiling msvcp60:
main.c:108:51: warning: ‘std_BADOFF_func’ defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
misc.c:66:40: warning: ‘mutex_mutex_lock’ defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
misc.c:73:40: warning: ‘mutex_mut
I get the following warnings when compiling msvcp60:
main.c:108:51: warning: ‘std_BADOFF_func’ defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
misc.c:66:40: warning: ‘mutex_mutex_lock’ defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
misc.c:73:40: warning: ‘mutex_mutex_unlock’ defined but not used
[-Wunused-
