On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Kevin Koltzau wrote:
> I just submitted a new variant of my original patch without using MaskBlt,
> which works under both Windows and wine currently
> Not meaning to hide a possible issue with MaskBlt, but my new patch
> should be a bit faster as MaskBlt does quite a bit of wo
On Monday 02 February 2004 12:27 am, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On the MaskBlt front, I've adapted that function from a post
> to the wine-patches list by a guy who never resurfaced. I have
> no idea if that implementation is good. It seems to work in some
> situations, but I wouldn't be surprised i
On January 31, 2004 12:48 am, Kevin Koltzau wrote:
> This brings up an interesting thing however..it works perfectly under
> windows (tested on XP), but produces strange results under wine.
Well, if this works perfectly on Windows, the bug is somewhere else,
not in this code. So it should go in ju
Implementation of TransparentBlt
This brings up an interesting thing however..it works perfectly under windows (tested
on XP), but produces strange results under wine.
MaskBlt seems to be broken, but I'm not quite sure what the cause is yet
I figured I'd send this out incase the
I noticed Warren Baird has submitted an implementation of TransparentBlt back
in Feb 2003.. http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/02/0029.html
I'm curious what was wrong with that implementation to keep it from being
committed, and what might be done to get it up to par..or may
