Alexandre wrote:
No, resend just one, making absolutely sure that you got everything
right, and wait for it to be committed before sending the next
one. You have to make sure you can walk before you try to run.
I would also suggest finding somebody to pre-review
your patch before you send it to
On 4/26/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Tom Spear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, so then if I resend them now, will you take a look? I believe I
> have fixed every problem with each one, as I havent gotten any more
> comments about something being borked.
No, resend just
"Tom Spear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, so then if I resend them now, will you take a look? I believe I
> have fixed every problem with each one, as I havent gotten any more
> comments about something being borked.
No, resend just one, making absolutely sure that you got everything
right,
On 4/26/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's particularly true for cosmetic patches like typo fixes; if I
have to spend more than 10 seconds on such a patch, chances are it
will end up in /dev/null.
Ok, so then if I resend them now, will you take a look? I believe I
have fi
"Tom Spear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just curious if Alexandre missed my patches for regedit and my trace
> fix for uninstaller, or if there is a backlog of commits to be done,
> or if he even plans to commit them, and if not, why..
You have been sending way too man
Just curious if Alexandre missed my patches for regedit and my trace
fix for uninstaller, or if there is a backlog of commits to be done,
or if he even plans to commit them, and if not, why..
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-April/038566.html -
Spelling fixes for regedit
http
