Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I think I'd rather have the old changelogs in the source
> package and leave it at that, and just include the current changelog
> in the binaries.
The old changelogs certainly won't be removed.
> Or, I suppose worst case (if the changelog is dro
James McKenzie skrev:
> Ove Kaaven wrote:
>> Alexandre Julliard skrev:
>>
>>> Objections? Does anybody feel a strong need for a Changelog file?
>>>
>>
>> I've used it a lot to look up when stuff might have been fixed (or
>> broken), and in general Debian packages are expected to ship a
>>
Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Alexandre Julliard skrev:
>
>> Objections? Does anybody feel a strong need for a Changelog file?
>>
>
> I've used it a lot to look up when stuff might have been fixed (or
> broken), and in general Debian packages are expected to ship a changelog
> if possible.
>
>
>
Alexandre Julliard skrev:
> Objections? Does anybody feel a strong need for a Changelog file?
I've used it a lot to look up when stuff might have been fixed (or
broken), and in general Debian packages are expected to ship a changelog
if possible.
Am Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 12:19:22 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> Objections? Does anybody feel a strong need for a Changelog file?
I'd say kill the changelog. I think I've never opened this file in my 4 years
I've been messing with wine
Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A while back, Alexandre promised to wipe the changelog file "when we hit
> 1.0 or when it hits 4 gigabytes, whichever comes first."
>
> Well, it's about time. I suggest removing all changes for entries
> earlier than Wine 1.0-rc1, as having it completel
A while back, Alexandre promised to wipe the changelog file "when we hit
1.0 or when it hits 4 gigabytes, whichever comes first."
Well, it's about time. I suggest removing all changes for entries
earlier than Wine 1.0-rc1, as having it completely empty would be a bit
silly. As for where to archi
