Arno Teigseth writes:
> @@ -47,9 +76,16 @@ static void __cdecl test_invalid_parameter_handler(const
> wchar_t *expression,
> const wchar_t *function, const wchar_t *file,
> unsigned line, uintptr_t arg)
> {
> -/* we just ignore handler calls */
> +/* we USED TO just ig
Arno Teigseth wrote:
>
You'll have to resend both parts of the patch for the testbot to recognize them.
Use (resend) in the subject line for us humans.
James McKenzie
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7897
Your paranoid android.
On Thursday 24 June 2010 12:14:34 pm Piotr Caban wrote:
> On 06/24/10 10:49, Paul Chitescu wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > What would be the best way of testing MSVCRT.DLL considering that many
> > functions may or may be not present in the native version?
> There are already such tests in msvcrt. Take a lo
On 06/24/10 10:49, Paul Chitescu wrote:
Hi!
What would be the best way of testing MSVCRT.DLL considering that many
functions may or may be not present in the native version?
There are already such tests in msvcrt. Take a look on e.g.
dlls/msvcrt/tests/misc.c. It's working well on older systems.
2010/6/24 Paul Chitescu :
> Hi!
>
> What would be the best way of testing MSVCRT.DLL considering that many
> functions may or may be not present in the native version?
>
>> > /*
>> > + * getenv_s - not exported in native
Hi!
What would be the best way of testing MSVCRT.DLL considering that many
functions may or may be not present in the native version?
> > /*
> > + * getenv_s - not exported in native msvcrt
> > + */
> > +int CDECL get
Aneurin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any particular reason this patch hasn't been committed?
> Something wrong or just overlooked?
You should implement the format strings in a way that the compiler
cannot check in order to avoid the warnings.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECT
Is there any particular reason this patch hasn't been committed?
Something wrong or just overlooked?
