2008/7/2 Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Zachary Goldberg wrote:
>> Also, Dan Kegel has been extraordinarily diligent in valgrinding of
>> late (/applause) and I just wanted to ask if we're doing anything to
>> support him?
>
> A few people are starting to run Valgrind themselves.
> How about this
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As a first step, James and I could (along with posting the errors
> to wine-devel) also post patches to revert the guilty changes.
> (And if we do it quickly enough, perhaps Alexandre can
> do the revert on the same day...)
> Then the author could fix and
Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> test.winehq.org ... is fantastic, but it doesn't give a very good feel for
> progress
> that all of these recent patches have been making.
I would love to see a feature added to test.winehq.org
which showed one tests's results across time (and platform).
That would let y
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been watching wine a bit recently and there's been a lot of
> activity (code wise) in new features (backpressure from the freeze I'm
> sure) and lots and lots of test fixes. I know we have test.winehq.org
Hello!
I've been watching wine a bit recently and there's been a lot of
activity (code wise) in new features (backpressure from the freeze I'm
sure) and lots and lots of test fixes. I know we have test.winehq.org
which is fantastic, but it doesn't give a very good feel for progress
that all of th
