>
> While removing todo_wine() for this cases silences the output, anybody
> running on an older kernel will hit an error.
>
> How to proceed in that case. Sould he have something like
> todo_linux(kernelversion){}?
This is interesting! Wine depends on other stuff too (libraries) and
similar t
Hallo,
with kernel 2.6.11 PeekNamedPipe() works as expected. This makes our test
suite report:
pipe.c:153: Test succeeded inside todo block: peek3 got 21 bytes available
pipe.c:186: Test succeeded inside todo block: peek4 got 21 bytes available
fixme:sync:SetNamedPipeHandleState 0x38 0x77a2fddc (n