On So, 2007-03-18 at 18:18 +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
> > > What I'd want to do would be the following:
> > > * add a user
> >
> > You must handle the case, that the user has no rights
> > to do that (User is not an Administrator).
>
> Sure. In that case, we just skip the tests like we do now. Nothin
On Sunday 18 March 2007 18:01, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> from netapi32/access.c:
>
> NetUserAdd / NetUserDel / NetUserChangePassword
Thanks.
> > What I'd want to do would be the following:
> > * add a user
> > * set the user password
> > [... run the tests...]
> > * delete the user
>
> You must
On So, 2007-03-18 at 12:23 +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
> Now, a better way to do this would be to actually get some stubbed out user
> database set up, add a user for testing purposes, run the tests and then
> delete the test user.
Sounds to be a good Idea.
> Now the question that's really bugging
Hi folks,
while planning my work on Kerberos and Negotiate, I realized that we need a
better way to test things like network authentication, the way we're doing it
right now depends on the person running the tests to have a certain setup in
the test environment, and e.g. the NTLM SSP tests use
