"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be better to remove a duplicate definition to avoid
> such bad things happening in the future.
Yeah that's the plan, it's part of the remaining dll separation
cleanup work.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> It would be better to remove a duplicate definition to avoid
> such bad things happening in the future.
By all means, I didn't look at the problem, it just seemed
that we must have some checks and bounds to avoid it. Now
that you mention it, IIRC the
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > winternl.h and thread.h definitions of structure TEB didn't have the
> > same size. Sync them up.
>
> A test would be good to avoid them diverging in the future...
It would be better to remove a duplicate definition to avoid
such bad things happ
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Eric Pouech wrote:
> winternl.h and thread.h definitions of structure TEB didn't have the
> same size. Sync them up.
A test would be good to avoid them diverging in the future...
--
Dimi.
