On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:44:54 +, Martin Garton wrote:
> The systray.c problem is just in comments.
> The others are not (don't appear to be from my inexperienced perspective)
> trivial.
Sounds like it collided with the atom interning code.
> Maybe I'm using an old version of the patch. Is the
> I maintain that patch - does it no longer apply? I noted a single merge
> conflict when I recently updated CVS but it's trivial to fix. Is this
> the issue?
I got:
1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dlls/shell32/systray.c.rej
5 out of 16 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file d
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:28:59 +, Martin Garton wrote:
> I realise that the systray patches as they currently stand will not be
> integrated and need making into a seperate program. However, in the
> meantime the existing systray patch Works For Me so does anyone have an
> updated version that ap
Hi,
I realise that the systray patches as they currently stand will not be
integrated and need making into a seperate program.
However, in the meantime the existing systray patch Works For Me so does
anyone have an updated version that applies against Wine-20040121?
Regards,
Martin Garton.
