On poniedziaÅek 07 marzec 2005 06:04 am, Jason Couture wrote:
> er.. I Just meant to convert PE -> ELF so that the programs could be run
> without wine. Just some *.dll.so files as depends...
But that's what wine is all about. They would still use wine. A mere PE->ELF
conversion doesn't make the
er.. I Just meant to convert PE -> ELF so that the programs could be
run without wine. Just some *.dll.so files as depends... NM thought
your are right it would make a good faq.
Scott Ritchie wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 15:00 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
Jason Couture wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 15:00 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Jason Couture wrote:
> > How hard would it be to introduce a "Re-Compiler" instead of an
> > interpreter? To convert PE -> ELF without having the source. The output
> > would not have to be a user runnable file maybe just a cache? Possiab
Jason Couture wrote:
How hard would it be to introduce a "Re-Compiler" instead of an
interpreter? To convert PE -> ELF without having the source. The output
would not have to be a user runnable file maybe just a cache? Possiable
Speed up? To avoid copyright issues maybe the elf could require the
How hard would it be to introduce a "Re-Compiler" instead of an
interpreter? To convert PE -> ELF without having the source. The output
would not have to be a user runnable file maybe just a cache? Possiable
Speed up? To avoid copyright issues maybe the elf could require the pe
to run? In my ex
