RE: Stubs needed by some Windows Update Installs

2004-03-17 Thread Robert Shearman
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > > "Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, Aric is correct, although it doesn't make a difference on the 32-bit > > Intel platform. On others sizeof(long) might not be equal to > sizeof(void*) > > and "void *" is the real type of handles. > > Alexandre explai

Re: Stubs needed by some Windows Update Installs

2004-03-16 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, Aric is correct, although it doesn't make a difference on the 32-bit > Intel platform. On others sizeof(long) might not be equal to sizeof(void*) > and "void *" is the real type of handles. Alexandre explained that already. That's a historical th

RE: Stubs needed by some Windows Update Installs

2004-03-16 Thread Robert Shearman
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > "Aric Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ > > @ stub SetupSetSourceListA > > @ stub SetupSetSourceListW > > @ stdcall SetupTermDefaultQueueCallback(ptr) > > -@ stub SetupTerminateFileLog > > +@ stdcall SetupTerminateFileLog(ptr) > > The argumen

Re: Stubs needed by some Windows Update Installs

2004-03-16 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Aric Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ > @ stub SetupSetSourceListA > @ stub SetupSetSourceListW > @ stdcall SetupTermDefaultQueueCallback(ptr) > -@ stub SetupTerminateFileLog > +@ stdcall SetupTerminateFileLog(ptr) The argument here should be 'long'. -- Dmitry.