Bill Medland wrote:
trace:ole:_marshal_interface ...{b3b13603-a675-11d2-9b95-00104b71eb3f}...
trace:ole:CoMarshalInterface (0x798f1940,
{b3b13603-a675-11d2-9b95-00104b71eb3f}, 0x79e309ec, 0, (nil), MSHLFLAGS_NORMAL)
trace:ole:IiFTMUnknown_fnQueryInterface
trace:ole:FTMarshalImpl_AddRef
fixme:
On May 4, 2006 07:19 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> >trace:ole:CoUnmarshalInterface (0x7be8c7a8,
> > {b3b13603-a675-11d2-9b95-00104b71eb3f}, 0x7be8c794)
> > trace:ole:get_unmarshaler_from_stream Using custom
> > unmarshaling trace:ole:CoCreateInstance
> > (rclsid={62a1cafb-1940-
Bill Medland wrote:
trace:ole:CoUnmarshalInterface (0x7be8c7a8,
{b3b13603-a675-11d2-9b95-00104b71eb3f}, 0x7be8c794)
trace:ole:get_unmarshaler_from_stream Using custom unmarshaling
trace:ole:CoCreateInstance (rclsid={62a1cafb-1940-798f-6859-a5623c7ba562},
pUnkOuter=(nil), dwClsContext=0001,
On May 4, 2006 04:14 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> >So, my next problem
> >
> >What's the status of custom marshaling, especially
> >out-of-process? Is it supposed to be quite well developed
> > (in which case I am trying to find out why our case is
> > different) or is it sti
Bill Medland wrote:
So, my next problem
What's the status of custom marshaling, especially
out-of-process? Is it supposed to be quite well developed (in
which case I am trying to find out why our case is different) or
is it still only just started?
Yes, custom marshaling should work. Ou
So, my next problem
What's the status of custom marshaling, especially
out-of-process? Is it supposed to be quite well developed (in
which case I am trying to find out why our case is different) or
is it still only just started?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect
