Re: Status of LoadLibrary and .so

2009-09-10 Thread Nicholas LaRoche
Paul Chitescu wrote: On Thursday 10 September 2009 22:10:37 Joe Dluzen wrote: Hi all, back a few years ago it didn't: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2003-July/018498.html Does anyone know of the status of LoadLibrary and a .so? Can it load directly or is there a workaround that doe

Re: Status of LoadLibrary and .so

2009-09-10 Thread Paul Chitescu
On Thursday 10 September 2009 22:10:37 Joe Dluzen wrote: > Hi all, > > back a few years ago it didn't: > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2003-July/018498.html > > Does anyone know of the status of LoadLibrary and a .so? Can it load > directly or is there a workaround that does not involv

Status of LoadLibrary and .so

2009-09-10 Thread Joe Dluzen
Hi all, back a few years ago it didn't: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2003-July/018498.html Does anyone know of the status of LoadLibrary and a .so? Can it load directly or is there a workaround that does not involve multiple processes and some sort of IPC? thanks, Joe