Alexander Morozov writes:
> @@ -592,7 +586,26 @@ BOOL WINAPI StartServiceCtrlDispatcherA( const
> SERVICE_TABLE_ENTRYA *servent )
> services[i] = info;
> }
>
> -service_run_main_thread();
> +disp = HeapAlloc( GetProcessHeap(), 0, sizeof(*disp) );
> +
> +if (!(disp->ma
Alexander Morozov writes:
> This patch partially fixes #30290.
>
> Pipe is renamed to spipe (service pipe) to prevent compilation error:
> service.c:88:15: error: ‘pipe’ redeclared as different kind of symbol
> /usr/include/unistd.h:414:12: note: previous declaration of ‘pipe’ was
> here
You sho
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
> Please ignore this patch. There are subtle differences between GCC and MSC I
> didn't
> notice at the moment of producing this patch. It would be better to keep it
> local
> in my own repos. ;-)
[...]
> > -BOOL WINAPI StartServiceCtrlDispatcherA( LPSE
Sunday, January 22, 2006, 5:28:18 PM, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> "Vitaliy" == Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Vitaliy> Now we have other thread waking up and continuing on with
> Vitaliy> error?! Did you skipped something? Because I haven't seen why
> Vitaliy> it ends up h
> "Vitaliy" == Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vitaliy> Now we have other thread waking up and continuing on with
Vitaliy> error?! Did you skipped something? Because I haven't seen why
Vitaliy> it ends up here.
>> 0009: get_console_input_info( handle=(nil) ) 0009:
Saturday, January 21, 2006, 5:01:42 PM, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Hallo,
> jtagserver.exe from the Altera Quartus suite hangs in a call to
> ConnectNamedPipe (as a result of a call to StartServiceCtrlDispatcherA())
> Anybody an idea what is going wrong?
I don't think that's what happens:
> Appended a
Hallo,
jtagserver.exe from the Altera Quartus suite hangs in a call to
ConnectNamedPipe (as a result of a call to StartServiceCtrlDispatcherA())
Anybody an idea what is going wrong?
Appended a +relay,+snoop,+ntdll,+file,+server,+advapi log from the point
where the main process is started.
--
U
Alexander Yaworsky wrote:
I even tried to submit a patch but it was silently ignored. Let me remind about this
patch --
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/06/0174.html maybe it will be
useful. If you have suggestions, I promise to
rewrite it as required ;))
Hi Alexandre,
Your patc
Hello
> Dont take offence if your patch goes to the void. Just resubmit after a
> a week to give it a chance to filter through Alexandre's tree. Its
> possible either
I merely meant that maybe something wrong with implementation. Well, I will resubmit
it soon.
Steven Edwards wrote:
Hi Alexander,
--- Alexander Yaworsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I even tried to submit a patch but it was silently ignored. Let me
remind about this patch --
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/06/0174.html maybe
it will be useful. If you have suggestions, I p
Hi Alexander,
--- Alexander Yaworsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I even tried to submit a patch but it was silently ignored. Let me
> remind about this patch --
> http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/06/0174.html maybe
> it will be useful. If you have suggestions, I promise to
> rewr
HEN |
| |
| CreateProcess===> ...
| wait for call to | initialization
| StartServiceCtrlDispatcher| must not be longer
| timeo
I think that this is incorrect. If you let StartServiceCtrlDispatcher to continue with
no error, you make calling
program think that it is running under control of service control manager. When
service program handles somehow any kind of its
launching, the behaviour may be quite different. Also
13 matches
Mail list logo
