On Thursday 22 March 2007 19:39, Carl Fongheiser wrote:
> Try reading the stuff under "About BITS", in particular the page titled
> "Life Cycle of a BITS Job".
> It states quite clearly there that it uses HTTP or HTTPS (or SMB in newer
> versions). Nothing mysterious.
Yes, I know, it's still not
On 3/22/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:43, James Hawkins wrote:
> Check out:
>
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa362820.aspx
That's what I was reading. It provides good information about the COM
interface, but not about the implementation.
Tr
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:43, James Hawkins wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:00, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > > Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer
> > > Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite usef
On 3/22/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:00, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer
> Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite useful.
This intrigued me, so I poked at the information on BITS a li
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:06, Juan Lang wrote:
> > Anyway, I don't know what shape our iphlpapi is in, but I think it
> > should be possible to at least get the basic features working in the
> > context of a SoC project.
>
> Okay, I'll bite. I looked at the BITS docs too, and it uses
> GetBestI
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:03, Jesse Allen wrote:
> > Go for it, people, only three days to do some more research on this. :)
>
> Is three days enough? How much are we really supposed to know before
> we apply for a project? If I take this idea for example, I don't know
> anything at all about i
> Anyway, I don't know what shape our iphlpapi is in, but I think it
> should be possible to at least get the basic features working in the
> context of a SoC project.
Okay, I'll bite. I looked at the BITS docs too, and it uses
GetBestInterface to pick an interface, and some interface stats to
de
On 3/22/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:00, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer
> Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite useful.
This intrigued me, so I poked at the information on BITS a li
On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:00, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer
> Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite useful.
This intrigued me, so I poked at the information on BITS a little. MSDN
provides some fluff about using it, bu
Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer Service).
Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite useful.
http://www.darvin.de/english/ is an interactive front end for BITS.
The other apps I know of that require it are Visual C# Express 2005 and
Google Pack, but there a
10 matches
Mail list logo
