Re: Side affects from running wineprefixcreate

2008-04-26 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Chris Robinson wrote: > On Saturday 26 April 2008 05:48:35 pm Vitaliy Margolen wrote: >> At a minimum all the created >> registry entries should not overwrite already existing ones. > > Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of having wineprefixcreate executed, > which is to update the registry?

Re: Side affects from running wineprefixcreate

2008-04-26 Thread Chris Robinson
On Saturday 26 April 2008 05:48:35 pm Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > At a minimum all the created > registry entries should not overwrite already existing ones. Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of having wineprefixcreate executed, which is to update the registry? Not that I don't agree there c

Side affects from running wineprefixcreate

2008-04-26 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
So for one notable problems is some file types being reset by Wine. Looks like it comes from dlls/mshtml/mshtml.inf. At a minimum all the created registry entries should not overwrite already existing ones. Vitaliy.