On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:17:13 +0100, Christoph Frick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
something is fishy in
wine and at least its good to talk about it... and prevent this in the
future.
quite so, I think this got sorted pretty quickly by Rob so the patch
should get into cvs to solve the anomoly.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:31:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >oh well and btw: gcc 4.0.2.pre (or so) is my compiler.
> come on fellas! now you're using unstable , pre-release compilers.
> please dont waste time here. There enough true disfunctionality in Wine
> that needs to be tracked d
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:25:17 +0100, Christoph Frick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
oh well and btw: gcc 4.0.2.pre (or so) is my compiler.
come on fellas! now you're using unstable , pre-release compilers.
please dont waste time here. There enough true disfunctionality in Wine
that needs to b
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:29:02AM +0100, zhilla wrote:
> before submitting this as bug, some advice please...
> on slackware 10.2 (gcc 3.3.6) i compile wine cvs, and it has worked so
> far. last version working is around or exactly 0.9.
> now, it compiles/installs fine, but any program, includin
Peter Beutner wrote:
Besides there is nowhere stated that there are only certain supported compiler
flags which
you should use.
Correct. Using any compiler flags other than what configure adds by
default is unsupported, untested and unreliable. Even seemingly
harmless flags such as "-Wall
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:39:44PM +0100, Peter Beutner wrote:
> Mike McCormack schrieb:
> > zhilla wrote:
> >> http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags . if gentoo people claim these are
> >> safe cflags, and it worked until couple days ago, then something is
> >> definetly wrong, right?
> >
> > This is
Mike McCormack schrieb:
> Peter Beutner wrote:
>> And it's not like -fomit-frame-pointer is such a high-risky
>> optimization flag.
>> Instead it is in general safe to use for 90% of applications out there
>
> If it fails for 10% of applications out there, then it's *not* safe!
The question is how
Peter Beutner wrote:
And it's not like -fomit-frame-pointer is such a high-risky optimization flag.
Instead it is in general safe to use for 90% of applications out there
If it fails for 10% of applications out there, then it's *not* safe!
(it basicly only prevents that you get some useful d
Mike McCormack schrieb:
> zhilla wrote:
>> http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags . if gentoo people claim these are
>> safe cflags, and it worked until couple days ago, then something is
>> definetly wrong, right?
>
> This is the wrong type of question for wine-devel, and better asked in
> Gentoo foru
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:11:26 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 05:29:02 +0100, zhilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
before submitting this as bug, some advice please...
well if you have to pretend your Athlon-xp is a 486 to get wine to work
I would say there's a problem th
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 05:29:02 +0100, zhilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
before submitting this as bug, some advice please...
on slackware 10.2 (gcc 3.3.6) i compile wine cvs, and it has worked so
far. last version working is around or exactly 0.9.
now, it compiles/installs fine, but any program,
zhilla wrote:
why it is wrong? developers are much more likely to know about compiler
flags than users, and gentooers probably use much more bleeding edge
version of gcc anyway
The way developers recommend compiling Wine is explained in the README
file. If you want our help, please try ou
Mike McCormack wrote:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags . if gentoo people claim these are
safe cflags, and it worked until couple days ago, then something is
definetly wrong, right?
This is the wrong type of question for wine-devel, and better asked in
Gentoo forums or wine-users.
why it is
zhilla wrote:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags . if gentoo people claim these are
safe cflags, and it worked until couple days ago, then something is
definetly wrong, right?
This is the wrong type of question for wine-devel, and better asked in
Gentoo forums or wine-users.
Mike
"zhilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> then, changed processor optimizations to much more conservative
> "-O2 -march=i486 -mcpu=i686"
> and it it works like a charm.
> athlon-xp optimizatins used in the first place are from
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags . if gentoo people claim these are
>
before submitting this as bug, some advice please...
on slackware 10.2 (gcc 3.3.6) i compile wine cvs, and it has worked so
far. last version working is around or exactly 0.9.
now, it compiles/installs fine, but any program, including starting just
"wine", "notepad" or anything else, ends up qui
16 matches
Mail list logo
