On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>>
>> Howdy all,
>>
>> I've been working on the test suite. I've got a few basic tests set up
>> with notepad, and I'm currently working on setting up the framework,
>> using AutoHotKey to both run all the tests and pars
Austin English wrote:
Howdy all,
I've been working on the test suite. I've got a few basic tests set up
with notepad, and I'm currently working on setting up the framework,
using AutoHotKey to both run all the tests and parse the logs for
failures/passing todo's.
You may have already had this
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:01 PM, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Austin English
> wrote:
>> Howdy all,
>>
>> I've been working on the test suite. I've got a few basic tests set up
>> with notepad, and I'm currently working on setting up the framework,
>> using AutoHotKey
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Austin English
wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> I've been working on the test suite. I've got a few basic tests set up
> with notepad, and I'm currently working on setting up the framework,
> using AutoHotKey to both run all the tests and parse the logs for
> failures/pass
Howdy all,
I've been working on the test suite. I've got a few basic tests set up
with notepad, and I'm currently working on setting up the framework,
using AutoHotKey to both run all the tests and parse the logs for
failures/passing todo's.
For those interested, here's the first 'real' script I'
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> You don't need wget - just have autohotkey install the web browser, open a
> webpage, and then download the files by point and click ;)
That's got a large potential for breaking on different resolutions/setups.
Vincent pointed out to me tha
2009/3/26 Vít Hrachový :
> Austin English wrote:
>>
>> I was more interested in a quick proof of concept. The flexibility of
>> autohotkey allows for lots of different methods for doing such things,
>> and a method that involves the majority of code being run under AHK
>> itself (and therefore on w
Austin English wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Vincent Povirk
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Austin English wrote:
From the looks of things, we could do just about everything in
autohotkey with enough elbow grease. It would only take a small
wrapper script to run it under win
Austin English wrote:
I was more interested in a quick proof of concept. The flexibility of
autohotkey allows for lots of different methods for doing such things,
and a method that involves the majority of code being run under AHK
itself (and therefore on wine AND windows) is very possible with
c
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Vincent Povirk
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Austin English
> wrote:
>> From the looks of things, we could do just about everything in
>> autohotkey with enough elbow grease. It would only take a small
>> wrapper script to run it under wine, or, if so
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Austin English wrote:
> From the looks of things, we could do just about everything in
> autohotkey with enough elbow grease. It would only take a small
> wrapper script to run it under wine, or, if someone wanted to later
> extend it, to windows.
Your current scri
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Austin English
wrote:
Here's a quick thrown together script to test firefox3.
>From the looks of things, we could do just about everything in
autohotkey with enough elbow grease. It would only take a small
wrapper script to run it under wine, or, if someone want
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Austin English wrote:
> [...]
>> I'd like to implement an application test suite. It's something that's
>> been discussed for Wine for quite a while, but has never been put into
>> place.
>
> As mentioned before, check
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Austin English wrote:
[...]
> I'd like to implement an application test suite. It's something that's
> been discussed for Wine for quite a while, but has never been put into
> place.
As mentioned before, check out cxtest. In particular the way they are
structured, with one sc
AutoHotkey is a Windows program so any tests written in it can also be
run on Windows. In fact, if you wrote everything in AHK, the entire
framework would be portable to any win32 system. But that may be more
crazy than you're going for.
I'm told cxtest does not work on Windows.
Vincent Povirk
Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> Hi Austin,
>
> Not sure if you are aware of it but there is also cxtest which was
> written by codeweavers under the gpl. See http://cxtest.ifne.eu:82/ it
> seems they (still?) use it regulary to track regressions. I haven't
> looked at it and don't know that autohot
Hi Austin,
Not sure if you are aware of it but there is also cxtest which was written
by codeweavers under the gpl. See http://cxtest.ifne.eu:82/ it seems they
(still?) use it regulary to track regressions. I haven't looked at it and
don't know that autohotkey stuff but how do both differ? Wouldn'
Howdy,
I'm planning on applying for Google Summer of Code 2009. I'm pretty
sure most people reading this list already know me, but for those that
don't, I frequently triage bugs in Bugzilla, help users on the forum,
and a few other things. I've also done quite a bit of work testing
wine on more ob
18 matches
Mail list logo