Hi Hans,
> Yes I contemplated that but then you reintroduce a conditional in
> the ascii case ( if (c > 0x7e) ), which somewhat defeats the
> purpose of using a lookup table.
Defeats? I don't think so. A single comparison that covers a large
number of cases is different than a cascade of compar
On Sunday 30 January 2005 22:29, Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi Hans, it looks like from values 0x7e onward the character class is
> always PATH_CHAR_CLASS_OTHER_VALID. If you like, for clarity you can fill
> in the value through 0x7f, but having a lookup table beyond this isn't
> necessary.
Yes I contem
Hi Hans, it looks like from values 0x7e onward the character class is
always PATH_CHAR_CLASS_OTHER_VALID. If you like, for clarity you can fill
in the value through 0x7f, but having a lookup table beyond this isn't
necessary.
Also, that means the data type can be unsigned char, not DWORD.
And, i
