On 18.12.2006 16:50, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Well, a manifest is just an text (.xml) file with the resource type set
> to RT_MANIFEST. Adding it into the resources is easy, the problem is that
> wrc doesn't support that kind of a resource, so that support should be
> added to wrc first.
RT_MANIF
"Paul Vriens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does it help if you rename it to test_setupapi.exe?
No :-( As soon as setup is contained in the name it doesn't run. The
link that Kevin showed makes sense now.
Any idea how we can approach this? Do we indeed need to start adding
manifests to some of o
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 00:12 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Paul Vriens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > While investigating that (several hours up to now) I found (not 100%
> > sure though) that if an executable (like our setupapi_test.exe) has the
> > word setup in it and is not properly sign
On Sunday 17 December 2006 10:46 am, Paul Vriens wrote:
> While investigating that (several hours up to now) I found (not 100%
> sure though) that if an executable (like our setupapi_test.exe) has the
> word setup in it and is not properly signed, Vista starts
> complaining !!!
>
> Just copying our
"Paul Vriens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While investigating that (several hours up to now) I found (not 100%
sure though) that if an executable (like our setupapi_test.exe) has the
word setup in it and is not properly signed, Vista starts
complaining !!!
Just copying our setupapi_test.exe to p
Hi,
I've started to run our winetest executable on Vista. The current output
is 7.8 MB or so, so we will never be able to sent it out just yet (1.5MB
limit).
I will start reducing the number of test failures on Vista (if I can of
course).
One thing that struck me and most likely it's due to Vist
