Re: Rude hack fixes Run Time Error 445:Object Doesn't Support This Action

2007-07-08 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi David, David Anderson wrote: > What if the above simply returned S_OK with a FIXME instead > of E_NOTIMPL??? Would that be an acceptable hack for the official > source? Sure, that'd be fine in this case. Feel free to send a patch. Thanks, Jacek

re: Rude hack fixes Run Time Error 445:Object Doesn't Support This Action

2007-07-07 Thread Dan Kegel
Dave wrote: The following rudely changed function: static HRESULT WINAPI WebBrowser_put_RegisterAsBrowser(... works around wine bug 5183. For me. The app I use to run the test is a VB app written by a friend Can you throw together a minimal test in VB and attach it with source and binary to b

Rude hack fixes Run Time Error 445:Object Doesn't Support This Action

2007-07-07 Thread David Anderson
The following rudely changed function: static HRESULT WINAPI WebBrowser_put_RegisterAsBrowser(IWebBrowser2 *iface, VARIANT_BOOL bRegister) { WebBrowser *This = WEBBROWSER_THIS(iface); FIXME("(%p)->(%x)\n", This, bRegister); TRACE("dadebug fake return\n"); /* My rude addition. */