On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
> wrote:
D'oh! Looks like I was fooled by a long-delayed message delivery. The
message I replied to is from *six months* ago. I've gotten several
of those from winehq in the last day or s
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
wrote:
> In that regard, let me say: this year I am coorganizing the
> CrossDesktop DevRoom at FOSDEM and I am truly disappointed we have not
> received a single talk proposal about Wine, even though I sent the
> call for talks and a reminder to
Hey,
Op 17-01-12 22:01, Dan Kegel schreef:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
So, exploring #3 a bit further - what if we asked for our own track
within FOSDEM 2013? (I presume that would be February 2013 in Brussels)
It would let us all get together, allow us to have a f
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
> Thank you for all the replies. Here is what I've taken away so far:
>
> 1. Our intro text was overtly hostile to users. I've removed that.
>
> 2. Potential attendees want a clear agenda.
>
> 3. Coordinating with another event remains i
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:21:47PM -0600, Vincent Povirk wrote:
> > Well, sure. I was replying to a suggestion that we tack
> > wineconf onto the side of, say, http://monospace.us/
> > by saying that I didn't think they'd be interested.
> > Do you think they would be?
>
> Well, most of them are n
> Well, sure. I was replying to a suggestion that we tack
> wineconf onto the side of, say, http://monospace.us/
> by saying that I didn't think they'd be interested.
> Do you think they would be?
Well, most of them are not very interested in Wine, but they're not
hostile to it either. So it's no
On January 17, 2012 at 8:49 PM Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Well, sure. I was replying to a suggestion that we tack
> wineconf onto the side of, say, http://monospace.us/
> by saying that I didn't think they'd be interested.
> Do you think they would be?
Well, if they would, it would be the greatest
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
> So, exploring #3 a bit further - what if we asked for our own track
> within FOSDEM 2013? (I presume that would be February 2013 in Brussels)
> It would let us all get together, allow us to have a few sessions
> targeted at non Wine develop
Thank you for all the replies. Here is what I've taken away so far:
1. Our intro text was overtly hostile to users. I've removed that.
2. Potential attendees want a clear agenda.
3. Coordinating with another event remains interesting.
So, exploring #3 a bit further - what if we aske
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> From what I recall, the Mono people don't really intend
>> to support those apps; they're more into supporting people
>> who are writing new apps from scratch.
>
> There needs to be some
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> From what I recall, the Mono people don't really intend
> to support those apps; they're more into supporting people
> who are writing new apps from scratch.
>
There needs to be some mechanism to provide for the legacy user, even if
they don't
Hello,
most of the answers i read so far were about the "content" of wineconf. Here
are two different ideas:
1. when i looked around a wineconf i noticed that wineconf 2012 is not fixed
jet. I know lots of companies here in Germany who ask their employee to
announce the plans for the holidays
Am 11.01.2012 16:23, schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2012, 23:00:38 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
- Users ... as this was brought up
Reality check: Wine users will not travel 100s of kms to a standalone
conference.
This would make sense only if we attach wineconf to another g
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2012, 23:00:38 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> - Users ... as this was brought up
>
> Reality check: Wine users will not travel 100s of kms to a standalone
> conference.
>
> This would make sense only if we attach wineconf to another general
> conference
An unconventional t
On January 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM Marcus Meissner wrote:
> - Perhaps a shrinking audience is unavoidable.
>
> This is a bit of a fact that some projects I have been in found hard to
>cope with... That after
> the interest peak it might go down.
>
And if you are looking for a reason, one i
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> What about Mono? .NET applications that use P/Invoke won't ever work outside
> Windows without Wine, so they kind of need us, and many native applications
> now also use .NET, so we kind of need them. Unlike with Samba, the licenses
> are
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
>
> - Attaching to other conferences?
>
> We do not really share much with other projects (please do not bring up
> Samba: we don't),
>
What about Mono? .NET applications that use P/Invoke won't ever work
outside Windows without Wine, so
Jeremy White wrote:
> the Wine conference has been a mostly annual affair since 2002 ...
> It's been in Minnesota about every 3rd year, and is otherwise
> 'normally' somewhere in Europe.
>
> How could Wineconf be different? If you've never been, what would
> encourage you to come?
One thing tha
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Alex Bradbury wrote:
> Another angle on this might be making some changes to WineConf, but
> also making a concerted effort to make sure Wine is well represented
> at events many developers and users already attend such as FOSDEM and
> OSCON.
In that regard, let
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> The workshop elements we introduced in the last years are however more the
> direction to go.
> So something of a workshop is my best bet at keeping interest.
>
>
> Question is whether we can find workshop style things besides "fixin
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:31:11PM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This past Wine conference, while great fun as always, was not as well
> attended as Wine conferences in the past.
>
> So I would like to stir up trouble by suggesting we rethink WineConf.
>
> For those that have not atte
On 9 January 2012 18:31, Jeremy White wrote:
> So I'd like to ask folks to brain storm with me.
>
> How could Wineconf be different? If you've never been, what would
> encourage you to come?
Another angle on this might be making some changes to WineConf, but
also making a concerted effort to mak
Users coming to Wineconf will likely want to hear about Wine's development;
what improvements they can expect, the progress on their favourite apps,
etc.
I suspect a great deal of users will also want to share their ideas on what
they feel is important in further developments.
J. Leclanche
On Tu
> Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:07 amPost subject:
> If you really want users to come, I suggest you change the second sentence on
> http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf. Right now it sends a very clear message that
> users are not the least bit welcome.
/me winces. I wrote that text; and I ne
On 01/09/2012 08:31 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> If you've been to a technical conference recently that you thought was
> well done, what did they do well? Anything we could emulate?
I've gave you some of this feedback in person at WineConf in France.
First, as long as it is aimed at W
Hi All,
This past Wine conference, while great fun as always, was not as well
attended as Wine conferences in the past.
So I would like to stir up trouble by suggesting we rethink WineConf.
For those that have not attended, the Wine conference has been a mostly
annual affair since 2002. It is o
26 matches
Mail list logo
