Re: Regression on ntdll:map_image function

2003-11-11 Thread Carlos Lozano
El mar, 11 de nov de 2003, a las 11:48, Alexandre Julliard escribio: > > This should fix it: [...] Yes, it is fixed :)), well done :) Thanks, Regards, Carlos. -- ___ _ \ | / Consulting | . |._ _ _| | ___ ___ ___http://www.andago.com | || ' |/ . |<_> |/ . |/ . \__

Re: Regression on ntdll:map_image function

2003-11-11 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Carlos Lozano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem happens in this line of the patch: > > -if (!(view = VIRTUAL_CreateView( ptr, total_size, 0, > VPROT_COMMITTED|VPROT_READ, hmapping ))) > +if (!(view = VIRTUAL_CreateView( ptr, total_size, 0, > + V

Regression on ntdll:map_image function

2003-11-10 Thread Carlos Lozano
Hello, The patch: http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2003/11/0011.html >Fixed type and protection values returned by NtQueryVirtualMemory to >be closer to what Windows does. >Allow using MEM_SYSTEM without MEM_RESERVE to avoid 64k alignment. >Use pread instead of lseek+read when faking mmap