"Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3/6/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Try this patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c b/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c
>> index bd9c16c..23b6cfd 100644
>> --- a/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c
>> +++ b/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c
>
On 3/6/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try this patch:
diff --git a/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c b/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c
index bd9c16c..23b6cfd 100644
--- a/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c
+++ b/dlls/wineps.drv/init.c
Yeah, that dit it; thanks!
Can I expect to see this in 0.9.33, then?
C
"Pedro Araujo Chaves Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Odd as it may seem, my regression testing pointed commit
> 21635133fb271405fefd6bce3078cf971e84c426 as the cause. I positioned my tree
> just before it, and the mail printed okay; I applied it, the mail came out
> blank again.
Try this patch
Hi all,
There's been a regression in printing in Lotus Notes R5 somewhere between
wine-0.9.27 and wine-0.9.28: it seems that the presence of an inline picture
(in this case, a logo) in the mail stationery prevents all text (including
header text) from being printed.
Odd as it may seem, my regres
