Re: Recent problems with shdocvw

2006-07-27 Thread Jacek Caban
Dan Kegel wrote: On 7/26/06, Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have looked at bugzilla. There is one regression (bug 5630) that needs more widl improvements to work. I have done some work on widl that will help it some time ago, but I've never had time to finish it. Dan Hipschman is foc

Re: Recent problems with shdocvw

2006-07-26 Thread Dan Kegel
On 7/26/06, Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have looked at bugzilla. There is one regression (bug 5630) that needs more widl improvements to work. I have done some work on widl that will help it some time ago, but I've never had time to finish it. Dan Hipschman is focused on widl impro

Re: Recent problems with shdocvw

2006-07-26 Thread Jacek Caban
Vitaliy Margolen wrote: Ever since replacement of Mozilla Active X control with new gecko. And shift of attention to mshtml we have lots of programs that still need shdocvw break. Is this a temporary or intentional? Could author look at related bugs on bugzilla? I have looked at bugzilla. T

Recent problems with shdocvw

2006-07-20 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Ever since replacement of Mozilla Active X control with new gecko. And shift of attention to mshtml we have lots of programs that still need shdocvw break. Is this a temporary or intentional? Could author look at related bugs on bugzilla? -- Best regards, Vitaliy