Re: {Heap,Global,Local,}ReAlloc status (take 2)

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi folks, > > Oleg has been doing a lot of good work, and we are now > down to 73 HeapReAlloc and 73 non-HeapReAlloc entries > to review. I'm still not sure how the comctl32.ReAlloc() > should behave, any help in getting that resolved would > be hig

Re: {Heap,Global,Local,}ReAlloc status (take 2)

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oleg has been doing a lot of good work, and we are now > down to 73 HeapReAlloc and 73 non-HeapReAlloc entries > to review. I'm still not sure how the comctl32.ReAlloc() > should behave, any help in getting that resolved would > be highly appreciate

{Heap,Global,Local,}ReAlloc status (take 2)

Hi folks, Oleg has been doing a lot of good work, and we are now down to 73 HeapReAlloc and 73 non-HeapReAlloc entries to review. I'm still not sure how the comctl32.ReAlloc() should behave, any help in getting that resolved would be highly appreciated. Here is the update list: ./controls/edit.c

ReAlloc status

Hi folks, As I said, there are over 200 instances of {Local,Global,Heap,}ReAlloc that need reviewing and/or fixing. We need to keep a close eye on these, so we don't let some fall through the cracks. I've compiled a list of all the places that need attention. We currently have 225 such places. Be