Re: winrash bug

2005-02-11 Thread Chris Morgan
Great! I had no idea if it was a single or multiple dlls that made up winsock2, this looks like a great way to detect it. I'm almost certain that there is NSIS code that can check for the ability to load up a dll. I'll put that in. Chris On Friday 11 February 2005 7:53 am, you wrote: > On

Re: Re: winrash bug

2005-02-11 Thread Francois Gouget
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Chris Morgan wrote: Oh, that's mostly because I was lazy. I'm pretty sure the text says that "if you are on windows95 you should install winsock2". I'm not sure how to detect whether the user needs to install winsock2 or not by looking at dlls. [...] Maybe something lkie th

Re: Re: winrash bug

2005-02-09 Thread Chris Morgan
> > From: Ivan Leo Puoti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/02/08 Tue PM 02:11:29 EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: wine-devel@winehq.com > Subject: Re: winrash bug > > Chris Morgan wrote: > > >Is this based on what the installer displays or upon output from w

Re: winrash bug

2005-02-08 Thread Ivan Leo Puoti
Chris Morgan wrote: Is this based on what the installer displays or upon output from winrash in the debug.txt file? It is based on the installer telling me I'm on windows 95 and that I must install the winsock2 update for windows 95. Ivan.

Re: winrash bug

2005-02-08 Thread Chris Morgan
Is this based on what the installer displays or upon output from winrash in the debug.txt file? Chris > > From: Ivan Leo Puoti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/02/08 Tue PM 01:35:43 EST > To: wine-devel@winehq.com > Subject: winrash bug > > version 0011 incorrectly detects windows nt 4.0 as