On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
[...]
3. winetest.exe currently assumes you're running under Windows.
See main.c line 577:
(putenv ("WINETEST_PLATFORM=windows") ||
Wouldn't it be useful to allow Linux results to be computed
and reported via winetest, too? Presumably it could detect
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 02:01:13PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > 1. Why are all the archived posts to wine-test-results empty?
> > See http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-tests-results/2004/11
> > Every message body is empty! What's up with that?
>
> That's a good question. Chris, what's going o
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 03:48:53PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
Ah, but you don't disable it, as far as I can tell.
As of last month, I was able to run winetest under Linux, and because of
that wrong environment setting, it got all the todo_wine's
wrong. In fact, winetest.exe.so
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 03:48:53PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Ah, but you don't disable it, as far as I can tell.
> As of last month, I was able to run winetest under Linux, and because of
> that wrong environment setting, it got all the todo_wine's
> wrong. In fact, winetest.exe.so is built by def
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
3. winetest.exe currently assumes you're running under Windows.
See main.c line 577:
(putenv ("WINETEST_PLATFORM=windows") ||
Wouldn't it be useful to allow Linux results to be computed
and reported via winetest, too? Presumably it could detect
that it's running on Linux
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 02:01:13PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> 1. Why are all the archived posts to wine-test-results empty?
> See http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-tests-results/2004/11
> Every message body is empty! What's up with that?
That's a good question. Chris, what's going on?
> 2. The
