Re: Failure in gdi/tests/metafile.c

2005-07-04 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Robert Shearman wrote: I wrote the test, but I'm beginning to wish I hadn't. The failures are either one of two things: differences in when the transforms are updated in Win9x mode or possibly because it is too sensitive to the DPI of the screen. It's definitly not caused by differing DPIs a

Re: Failure in gdi/tests/metafile.c

2005-07-04 Thread Robert Shearman
Uwe Bonnes wrote: Hallo, ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so metafile.c failes like: metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)->(10,10), expected (0,0)->(18,67) metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)->(10,10), expected (0,0)->(18,67) Some discussion on #wineh

Re: Failure in gdi/tests/metafile.c

2005-07-03 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Uwe Bonnes wrote: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so metafile.c failes like: metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)->(10,10), expected (0,0)->(18,67) metafile.c:457: Test failed: (0,0)->(10,10), expected (0,0)->(18,67) Some discussion on #winehackers br