Re: RFC - ws2_32/socket.c: SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS vs TCP_KEEPIDLE/TCP_KEEPINTVL

2011-08-30 Thread Juan Lang
Hi Bruno, > The SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS message on windows takes parameters as > miliseconds, on some other systems there are the equivalent > TCP_KEEPIDLE/TCP_KEEPINTVL which takes the parameters as seconds. To > solve this there is a division by 1000 on wine source code but the > problem is that valu

RFC - ws2_32/socket.c: SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS vs TCP_KEEPIDLE/TCP_KEEPINTVL

2011-08-30 Thread Bruno Jesus
This discussion is related to the test failing in bug 21271: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21271 The SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS message on windows takes parameters as miliseconds, on some other systems there are the equivalent TCP_KEEPIDLE/TCP_KEEPINTVL which takes the parameters as seconds. To s