> Why? AFAIK getifaddr was added to at least openSolaris Last year and you
> still can use the old Code as fallback
Yes, by "keeping the current code" I meant alongside a
getifaddrs-based implementation.
--Juan
Why? AFAIK getifaddr was added to at least openSolaris Last year and you still
can use the old Code as fallback
Gesendet mit meinem HTC
- Reply message -
Von: "Juan Lang"
An: "Michael Stefaniuc"
Cc: "Wine Devel"
Betreff: RFC: depending on getifaddrs i
>> I'm thinking of replacing the current IPv4 enumeration code, which
>> uses ioctl/SIOCGIFCONF, with getifaddrs. The reason I'm leaning
>> toward replacing, rather than adding side-by-side with the current
>> code, is that getifaddrs is commonly available: it's available on all
>> recent version
Hello Juan,
Juan Lang wrote:
> right now iphlpapi uses autoconf to detect if getifaddrs is available,
> and only uses it to enumerate IPv6 addresses.
>
> I'm thinking of replacing the current IPv4 enumeration code, which
> uses ioctl/SIOCGIFCONF, with getifaddrs. The reason I'm leaning
> toward
Hi folks,
right now iphlpapi uses autoconf to detect if getifaddrs is available,
and only uses it to enumerate IPv6 addresses.
I'm thinking of replacing the current IPv4 enumeration code, which
uses ioctl/SIOCGIFCONF, with getifaddrs. The reason I'm leaning
toward replacing, rather than adding si