Re: Antw.: RFC: depending on getifaddrs in iphlpapi

2011-11-10 Thread Juan Lang
> Why? AFAIK getifaddr was added to at least openSolaris Last year and you > still can use the old Code as fallback Yes, by "keeping the current code" I meant alongside a getifaddrs-based implementation. --Juan

Antw.: RFC: depending on getifaddrs in iphlpapi

2011-11-10 Thread André Hentschel
Why? AFAIK getifaddr was added to at least openSolaris Last year and you still can use the old Code as fallback Gesendet mit meinem HTC - Reply message - Von: "Juan Lang" An: "Michael Stefaniuc" Cc: "Wine Devel" Betreff: RFC: depending on getifaddrs i

Re: RFC: depending on getifaddrs in iphlpapi

2011-11-10 Thread Juan Lang
>> I'm thinking of replacing the current IPv4 enumeration code, which >> uses ioctl/SIOCGIFCONF, with getifaddrs.  The reason I'm leaning >> toward replacing, rather than adding side-by-side with the current >> code, is that getifaddrs is commonly available:  it's available on all >> recent version

Re: RFC: depending on getifaddrs in iphlpapi

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Hello Juan, Juan Lang wrote: > right now iphlpapi uses autoconf to detect if getifaddrs is available, > and only uses it to enumerate IPv6 addresses. > > I'm thinking of replacing the current IPv4 enumeration code, which > uses ioctl/SIOCGIFCONF, with getifaddrs. The reason I'm leaning > toward

RFC: depending on getifaddrs in iphlpapi

2011-11-10 Thread Juan Lang
Hi folks, right now iphlpapi uses autoconf to detect if getifaddrs is available, and only uses it to enumerate IPv6 addresses. I'm thinking of replacing the current IPv4 enumeration code, which uses ioctl/SIOCGIFCONF, with getifaddrs. The reason I'm leaning toward replacing, rather than adding si