On July 9, 2004 12:58 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
> I believe we have a licensing issue with the crypto implementation in
> Wine and would like feedback relating to this. I know that some of the
> OpenSSL developers monitor this list so please provide feedback.
We are lurking everywhere, you are nev
Hi Lionel,
--- Lionel Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, from the FAQ on OpenSSL, they say that on Linux systems it
> should not
> be a problem as OpenSSL is part of the 'base' system. No idea if RMS
> would
> agree to that one though :-)
I know what his answer is. I to him before about a b
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 09:58:04AM -0700, Steven Edwards wrote:
> This stipulation seems to introduce a incompatibility with the GPL. For
> normal Wine this is not a big deal but if someone wants to make a
> Winelib application that is GPL or if I want to take Wines Wininet and
> Adavapi32 code in
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:58:04 -0700, Steven Edwards wrote:
> From the what I understand this lib provides everything we need so all
> it really means is that our soft dependency on OpenSSL in now a soft
> dependency on Mozilla. If we want to use the webbrowser module in Wine
> then a Mozilla depende
Hello,
I believe we have a licensing issue with the crypto implementation in
Wine and would like feedback relating to this. I know that some of the
OpenSSL developers monitor this list so please provide feedback.
The first question is in regards to the following:
Clause 3 of OpenSSL license:
*
