Morten Rønne writes:
> That struct is already defined in wine/winbase16.h as PDB16.
>
> So I would like to do this in my test program:
> #include
> PDB16 *psp;
>
> In a perfect world this would be enough to have full access to the
> PDB16 struct in the test program.
> But alas, the world is
On 02-09-2010 21:21, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Morten Rønne writes:
I am looking for a way to change windef.h so that it will create the
correct base types for both 16 and 32 bit compile.
Openwatcom defines the symbol __I86__ while compiling for 16 bit, is
it acceptable that I use that to
On 02-09-2010 21:21, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Morten Rønne writes:
I am looking for a way to change windef.h so that it will create the
correct base types for both 16 and 32 bit compile.
Openwatcom defines the symbol __I86__ while compiling for 16 bit, is
it acceptable that I use that to
Morten Rønne writes:
> I am looking for a way to change windef.h so that it will create the
> correct base types for both 16 and 32 bit compile.
>
> Openwatcom defines the symbol __I86__ while compiling for 16 bit, is
> it acceptable that I use that to create 16 bit types?
> It seems that _MSC_VE
This is related to the creation of the DOS test programs for which I
have sent another mail.
But this is a more generic question relating to the fact that openwatcom
is a 16 bit compiler while gcc (of course) is a 32 bit compiler.
Currently this have lead me to drop the inclusion of the files
